Re: Packages needed to create a virtual environment in Python 3.9

2025-04-18 Thread Mercurio, Steven W-CTR (FAA) via Cygwin
hon312 pkg provided in Cygwin installs without ay issues From: Cygwin on behalf of David Dyck via Cygwin Sent: Friday, April 18, 2025 8:16 AM To: Philippe Baril Lecavalier Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Packages needed to create a virtual environment in

Re: Packages needed to create a virtual environment in Python 3.9

2025-04-18 Thread David Dyck via Cygwin
thank you P.B. Lecavalier! I greatly appreciate your response! Perhaps this can guide the cygwin packaging in te future I was missing ` python-setuptools-wheel` but I had installed the ` python-setuptools-wheel` Now I have success $ python3 -m ensurepip Looking in links: /tmp/tmpy457n2k6 Requir

Re: Packages needed to create a virtual environment in Python 3.9

2025-04-18 Thread Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin
Try these, seemingly not pulled from installing python39: python-setuptools-wheel python-pip-wheel I confirm the issue with a fresh install with python3{8,9}. pip is provided, but `ensurepip` gives that error. I think it should be the opposite on a basic python install: No pip package sho

Re: Packages needed to create a virtual environment in Python 3.9

2025-04-17 Thread David Dyck via Cygwin
I ran into this error today ( I was trying to use https://github.com/raulgotor/linkerscope.git ) but even with an empty folder I get error message even after I install " python-pip-wheel" from setup $ mkdir /tmp/pip-test ; cd /tmp/pip-test ; python3.9 -m venv venv mkdir /tmp/pip-test ; cd /tmp

Re: Packages of mingw64 i686/x86_64 openssl 1.1.1 are empty!

2022-08-13 Thread Achim Gratz
Carlo B. writes: > Actually, if you get the "src" packages of openssl for mingw64 and you > try to build them with cygport, it happens that includes, DLLs and > libraries are installed directly into the *REAL* destination > directory, into: > > /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw > > or: > > /us

Re: Packages not found by setup 2.873

2016-04-04 Thread Achim Gratz
EMMANUELLE FOURNIER partnre.com> writes: > And without -C base and with --quiet-mode, it's ok. Installing the whole Base category is implied, so no need to specify it (and anyway it would be Base, with a capital B). Regards, Achim -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: Packages not found by setup 2.873

2016-04-04 Thread EMMANUELLE FOURNIER
Have a nice day Regards, Emmanuelle FOURNIER E-mail : emmanuelle.fourn...@partnre.com - Mail original - De: "Warren Young" À: "cygwin" Envoyé: Vendredi 1 Avril 2016 03:09:42 Objet: Re: Packages not found by setup 2.873 On Mar 31, 2016, at 2:57 AM, EMMANUELLE F

Re: Packages not found by setup 2.873

2016-03-31 Thread Warren Young
On Mar 31, 2016, at 2:57 AM, EMMANUELLE FOURNIER wrote: > > I've changed in tar.bz2, because in the x86 version of program, they were in > tar.bz2. You’ve misdiagnosed the cause of the change. Cygwin changed from distributing bz2-packed tarballs to xz-packed tarballs many months ago for both

Re: Packages not found by setup 2.873

2016-03-31 Thread EMMANUELLE FOURNIER
Good Morning, First of all, thank you for answering me. - For packages format, I'm not an expert, so I've changed in tar.bz2, because in the x86 version of program, they were in tar.bz2. But if you mean that is not a cause, I will modify this. - I've modified setup in order to find packages

Re: Packages not found by setup 2.873

2016-03-30 Thread Warren Young
On Mar 30, 2016, at 12:27 AM, EMMANUELLE FOURNIER wrote: > > - packages are in tar.xz, I've made them in tar.bz2 Why? You’re using Cygwin’s own installer underneath NSIS, and that program has XZ decompression built in. Why use a less efficient compression method? > - setup.ini has been mod

Re: Packages for Cygwin 2.87

2015-05-05 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 5/5/2015 9:06 PM, Brown, Eric M wrote: Hi, I downloaded the .exe for Cygwin 2.87 and tried to install on my pc but do not see any available packages to install. I was trying to install the x11 package. How would I be able to get the packages? I will be setting this up on a standalone pc. Tha

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-10-08 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-09-19 09:56, Warren Young wrote: 3. Other than time, is there a reason you haven't released R50b yet? It seems to pass its own test suite here, so if I adopt it, I'm committing to releasing R50b shortly, unless there are traps I haven't discovered. I suspect it was just a matter of tim

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-10-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Warren, On Sep 19 08:56, Warren Young wrote: > On 9/18/2014 11:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > > >I'm looking for any volunteers to take over > >maintainership of the following packages: mksh > > I'm also somewhat interested in this one. I've never been a Korn shell > user, but I recently lear

Re: Packages up for adoption [GOLD STAR]

2014-09-21 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 13:44 -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > I haven't used Cygwin for quite some time and unfortunately I don't > > think I'll have the time to maintain the packages that I currently > > look after. As such I'm looking for any volunteers to take over > > maintainership of the f

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-09-19 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 18/09/2014 19:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Hi All, I haven't used Cygwin for quite some time and unfortunately I don't think I'll have the time to maintain the packages that I currently look after. As such I'm looking for any volunteers to take over maintainership of the following packages: as

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-09-19 Thread Warren Young
On 9/18/2014 11:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm looking for any volunteers to take over maintainership of the following packages: mksh I'm also somewhat interested in this one. I've never been a Korn shell user, but I recently learned about mksh and its place in Bourne family shell history.

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-09-19 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 19/09/2014 16:31, Warren Young wrote: On 9/18/2014 11:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm looking for any volunteers to take over maintainership of the following packages: ... hexedit I could do hexedit. I downloaded the source package, and was happy to see that you'd cygported it already. It

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-09-19 Thread Warren Young
On 9/18/2014 11:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm looking for any volunteers to take over maintainership of the following packages: ... hexedit I could do hexedit. I downloaded the source package, and was happy to see that you'd cygported it already. It looks to be pretty rarely updated, which

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-09-18 Thread Steven Penny
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > As such I'm looking for any volunteers to take over maintainership of the > following packages: astyle, cppcheck, googlecl, hexedit, libsigc2.0, > libtorrent, mingw-runtime, mingw-w32api, mksh, python-gdata, rtorrent and wtf. I could take

Re: Packages up for adoption

2014-09-18 Thread David Stacey
On 18/09/14 18:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I haven't used Cygwin for quite some time and unfortunately I don't think I'll have the time to maintain the packages that I currently look after. As such I'm looking for any volunteers to take over maintainership of the following packages: astyle, cppch

Re: Packages up for adoption [GOLD STAR]

2014-09-18 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 13:44 -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > I haven't used Cygwin for quite some time and unfortunately I don't > think I'll have the time to maintain the packages that I currently > look after. As such I'm looking for any volunteers to take over > maintainership of the following p

Re: /packages CGI HTML modernization

2014-06-20 Thread Warren Young
On 6/20/2014 11:11, Christopher Faylor wrote: Please take this elsewhere. website patches are off-topic for cygwin-patches. Fine, we're on the main mailing list now. But, FYI, when it comes to the web site, I'm not really too interested in fixing something that isn't broken. I just gave yo

Re: packages

2008-07-22 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:09:55PM -0400, Lee D. Rothstein wrote: > Gary Johnson wrote: > > > On 2008-07-18, r wrote: > > >> I'm new about cygwin, but I use from a lot SuSE and OpenSuSE > >> can I install packages rpm from linux distributions on cygwin ? > > > > No. First off, Cygwin doesn't use Re

Re: packages

2008-07-22 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2008-07-22, Lee D. Rothstein wrote: > Gary Johnson wrote: > > > On 2008-07-18, r wrote: > > >> I'm new about cygwin, but I use from a lot SuSE and OpenSuSE > >> can I install packages rpm from linux distributions on cygwin ? > > > > No. First off, Cygwin doesn't use Red Hat's package manager, it

Re: packages

2008-07-22 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Lee D. Rothstein wrote: Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2008-07-18, r wrote: >> I'm new about cygwin, but I use from a lot SuSE and OpenSuSE >> can I install packages rpm from linux distributions on cygwin ? > No. First off, Cygwin doesn't use Red Hat's package manager, it > uses its own packag

Re: packages

2008-07-22 Thread Lee D. Rothstein
Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2008-07-18, r wrote: >> I'm new about cygwin, but I use from a lot SuSE and OpenSuSE >> can I install packages rpm from linux distributions on cygwin ? > No. First off, Cygwin doesn't use Red Hat's package manager, it > uses its own package manager, setup.exe. Secondl

Re: packages

2008-07-19 Thread r
Gary Johnson spk.agilent.com> writes: > The only way to find out is to download and unpack the .tar.gz > archive and try to build the program, then troubleshoot any errors > you encounter. > > Regards, > Gary > > ok I lack in programming, but I'll try r -- Unsubscribe info: http

Re: packages

2008-07-18 Thread Gary Johnson
On 2008-07-18, r wrote: > I'm new about cygwin, but I use from a lot SuSE and OpenSuSE > can I install packages rpm from linux distributions on cygwin ? No. First off, Cygwin doesn't use Red Hat's package manager, it uses its own package manager, setup.exe. Secondly, binaries built for Linux w

RE: packages for groupadd and useradd commands

2006-04-20 Thread Dave Korn
On 20 April 2006 10:53, Harmin Rueda wrote: > Hi: > > Can anybody tell me which packages do I need to install in order to > execute the following commands: > > groupadd > useradd To do this on cygwin, you need to add the user accounts and groups in windows, then regenerate your passwd and gro

Re: packages..

2005-04-25 Thread Larry Hall
At 03:05 PM 4/25/2005, you wrote: >Hello! > >I will install cygwin but I need to know which >packages I will download. >to my computer with Cygwin setup helper. > >I want to download a setup file and install it but >there are a lot of packages. > >I dont know which one is solution to my problem.Li

Re: Packages question

2005-02-14 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:37:36 +, Christopher Benson-Manica wrote: > I'm trying to figure out which Cygwin packages correspond to the > sgml-common and xml-common Redhat packages. Does the OpenSP package > encompass both of these packages, or do I need to install some > additional packages? Th

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-13 Thread Reini Urban
Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 03:08:44PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 03:08:44PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: >Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>> Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development packages,

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-13 Thread Reini Urban
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development packages, these all are basic libraries or compilers for developers. And, yet, I'm a dev

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development packages, these all are basic libraries or compilers for developers. And, yet, I'm a developer, and I don't have o

RE: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Harig, Mark
> > > screen > > > > In some cases we have packages which offer > similar-but-not-identical behavior > > but in some cases (ping, screen) we don't have anything > close, AFAIK. > > I've been running screen on cygwin for years - originally using > http://dellelce.com/code/screen/ - though it wa

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you >asked for development packages, these all are basic libraries or >compilers for developers. And, yet, I'm a developer, and I don't have one of those libraries

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: bind I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this initial port, the server needs more testing: http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ coreutils mailx p

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: bind I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this initial port, the server needs more testing: http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ coreutils mailx p

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>bind > >I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this >initial port, the server needs more testing: > http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ > >>coreutils >>mailx >>ping >>se

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: bind I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this initial port, the server needs more testing: http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ coreutils mailx ping sendmail screen In some cases we have packages which offer similar-but-not-identical be

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Mark Ord
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > A line, since gmane *thinks* I'm top posting. I found this thread looking for any info on starting bind successfully as a service (anyone?), hence the delayed reply... > This is an off-the-top-of-my-head list of standard packages which are missing > from

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-10-20 Thread Ariel Burbaickij
Ok. That is fine. I got xmove running on cygwin, so if you want I can contribute the executable and/or slighlty modified makefile if required. It would be great if we could port xmx to cygwin On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:15:43 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-10-19 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ariel Burbaickij wrote: | script I have an implementation of script, based on a message to this list a few years ago, available on my project webpage: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cygwin-ports/ It works fine for me. Seeing as this is among the Frequ

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-10-19 Thread Ariel Burbaickij
script On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:22:54 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an off-the-top-of-my-head list of standard packages which are missing > from the cygwin distribution: > > bind > coreutils > mailx > ping > sendmail > screen > > In some cases we have packages whi

Re: Packages' integrity

2002-12-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:15:12AM -0400, John Daniel Doucette wrote: > Hi, > > I just downloaded a complete set of packages. After downloading them I > tested to make sure there was no error in the download. I used: > > find . -name "*.gz" -exec gzip -t -v {} \; > find . -name "*.bz2" -exec b