Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:10:35AM -0400, CBFalconer wrote: >Thomas Mellman wrote: >> >> Thank you, that helped. Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea: >> particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional, >> rather than standard Unix command line behaviour (IMHO) being optiona

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-18 Thread Randall R Schulz
At 09:07 2002-10-17, you wrote: On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:10:35AM -0400, CBFalconer wrote: >Thomas Mellman wrote: >> >> Thank you, that helped. Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea: >> particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional, >> rather than standard Unix command lin

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: new gdb interface Regarding the default window-fied behaviour of GDB - is that POSIX? It certainly doesn't seem in the spirit of POSIX. -- Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keine verlo

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman
Regarding the default window-fied behaviour of GDB - is that POSIX? It certainly doesn't seem in the spirit of POSIX. -- Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Keine verlorenen Lotto-Quittungen, keine vergessenen Gewinn

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Roland Schwingel
Hi... Cygwin uses insight, the gnu gdb frontend (which when you got used to it, can help a lot) and which is included in newer gdb versions.It is *NOT* a cygwin extenstion. To start in traditional mode run gdb with the -nw option. Roland Thomas Mellman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAI

Re: Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman
egor duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 17.10.02 10:10:39: > Hi! > > Thursday, 17 October, 2002 Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > TM> I had to power down my box - neither kill(-9) on either the process under test, > TM> the debugger or the debugger window, nor even the task manager we

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread CBFalconer
Thomas Mellman wrote: > > Thank you, that helped. Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea: > particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional, > rather than standard Unix command line behaviour (IMHO) being optional. Amen. -- Chuck F ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread egor duda
Hi! Thursday, 17 October, 2002 Thomas Mellman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TM> I had to power down my box - neither kill(-9) on either the process under test, TM> the debugger or the debugger window, nor even the task manager were able TM> to kill the two processes, and even windows-shutdown hung.

Re: RE: new gdb interface

2002-10-17 Thread Thomas Mellman
"Paul D. DeRocco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 17.10.02 09:13:35: > "gdb --help" indicates that "gdb -nw" does what you want. > Thank you, that helped. Nevertheless, let me re-iterate my plea: particularly in the CYGWIN world, fancy do-dads should be optional, rather than standard Unix comma

RE: new gdb interface

2002-10-16 Thread Al Slater
try gdb --help Al > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of Thomas Mellman > Sent: 17 October 2002 08:02 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: new gdb interface > > > I'm not sure if this is a cygwin issue, but... > > I just ran gdb for th