Re: nano and TERM

rom: "Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2003 4:04 AM Subject: Re: nano and TERM > On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hmm, unable to reproduce your problem here &g

Re: nano and TERM

*** Igor Pechtchanski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote today: IP> I'm not sure why pico works, possibly because it has an internal IP> termcap entry for a dumb terminal and uses that when the IP> terminfo/termcap database cannot be found. Pico as built for cygwin uses the termcap entries found in /etc/t

Re: nano and TERM

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:42:44PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >(I know http://www.nano-editor.org supply a zipped version of nano claimed >to be "for Windows" but since on un-zipping the provision, it turns out to >include cygwin1.dll, Sigh. I've sent them excruciatingly polite email. I exp

Re: nano and TERM

On Sat, 5 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hmm, unable to reproduce your problem here > > so far, prehaps some more details would be useful. > > Gareth - nano packaging type guy. > > Thank you for getting back to me. This is what I meant. > > When Cygwin is installed (i.e. after running setup

Re: nano and TERM

> Hmm, unable to reproduce your problem here > so far, prehaps some more details would be useful. > Gareth - nano packaging type guy. Thank you for getting back to me. This is what I meant. When Cygwin is installed (i.e. after running setup, filesystems are mounted, registry entries are made, etc

Re: nano and TERM

Hmm, unable to reproduce your problem here so far, prehaps some more details would be useful. Regards, Gareth - nano packaging type guy. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 6:05 PM Subject: nano and T