Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread Mike Fahlbusch
Hi Cygwinners, On 10/06/2016 3:19 AM, David Stacey wrote: On 09/06/16 17:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 9 18:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 09/06/2016 17:52, Jack Adrian Zappa wrote: Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O It is clearly spam or worse. But som

Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > On Jun 9 18:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> On 09/06/2016 17:52, Jack Adrian Zappa wrote: >> > Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O >> > >> >> It is clearly spam or worse. >> >> But some of them will always pass whatever filter the cyg

Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread David Stacey
On 09/06/16 17:14, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Jun 9 18:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 09/06/2016 17:52, Jack Adrian Zappa wrote: Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O It is clearly spam or worse. But some of them will always pass whatever filter the cygwin mail s

Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread Erik Soderquist
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 9 18:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: >> On 09/06/2016 17:52, Jack Adrian Zappa wrote: >> > Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O >> > >> >> It is clearly spam or worse. >> >> But some of them will always pass

Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 9 18:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 09/06/2016 17:52, Jack Adrian Zappa wrote: > > Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O > > > > It is clearly spam or worse. > > But some of them will always pass whatever filter the cygwin mail > server is implementing. > So

Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 09/06/2016 17:52, Jack Adrian Zappa wrote: Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O It is clearly spam or worse. But some of them will always pass whatever filter the cygwin mail server is implementing. Some of them are reaching any mailbox also company's one.

Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread Jack Adrian Zappa
Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O A On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Jack Adrian Zappa wrote: > Are you referring to the 83.dotm file? Looks highly suspicious. o.O > > > A > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Marco Atzeri > wrote: >> >> On 09/06/2016 17:08

Re: malware

2016-06-09 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 09/06/2016 17:08, Nellis, Kenneth wrote: Dear Cygwin, A little supposition here, but it appears that the recent posting from Viverra Inc. contained a malicious attachment, as detected by my company's e-mail malware detection as it intercepted the recent digest. I need now to appeal to them to