On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 07:53:46PM +0200, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
>Yes, you are correct, we do this now in this way. Cygwin is the only
>environment for which we have to do this and I just don't like it. It means
>we have to include math.h in a header file where we don't need it. A change
>to a fun
Hi,
> And the answer there will probably be that if your code depends on
whether
> this function is a macro or a real function then your code is not valid C.
> The C language spec specifically says that implementations are free to
> provide library functions as macros as well as functions. See
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> > Sent: 14 June 2004 14:48
>
> > On Jun 14 14:11, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Are there plans to deliver log2 as regular function instead of
> > > macro. Th
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: 14 June 2004 14:48
> On Jun 14 14:11, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are there plans to deliver log2 as regular function instead
> of macro. The
> > log2 as macro is hard to use in projects that also
On Jun 14 14:11, Johnny Willemsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there plans to deliver log2 as regular function instead of macro. The
> log2 as macro is hard to use in projects that also define a log2 function. I
> know, we can work around it, but it comes back and back again.
You could ask this on the ne
5 matches
Mail list logo
