Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 09/08/2009 17:04, Dave Korn wrote:
> So let me put it to you this way: I have two packages requiring libffi,
> namely gnustep-base and pygobject2, the latter of which explicitly deps
> libffi-3.0. Which libffi should I use right now, gcc-4.3.2 or standalone?
Right
On 09/08/2009 17:04, Dave Korn wrote:
The current one isn't perfect, no, but is probably marginally better than
anything built from the pre-merge upstream libffi repository. Even after the
merge there were still a bunch of bugs, but I've fixed them in GCC and am just
waiting for one of the gu
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> From a quick scan of the gcc patches list, it looks like they just
> synced the code between gcc and libffi. But, AFAICS from gcc SVN, they
> didn't add a libffi.pc pkg-config file, which the standalone version
> provides and some libffi-dependent packages expect to fin
3 matches
Mail list logo
