Re: info: x86: prev@6.1-2, x86_64: prev@6.3-1

On Mon, 3 Jul 2017 08:20:30, Ken Brown wrote: > On 7/3/2017 4:23 AM, Houder wrote: > > Ken, > > > > Noticed a difference where I did not expect one ... > > > > Oversight OR on purpose? > > > > prev of info in x86 is at 6.1-2, while it is at 6.3-1 in x86_64 > > I have no idea how that happened,

Re: info: x86: prev@6.1-2, x86_64: prev@6.3-1

On 7/3/2017 4:23 AM, Houder wrote: Ken, Noticed a difference where I did not expect one ... Oversight OR on purpose? prev of info in x86 is at 6.1-2, while it is at 6.3-1 in x86_64 I have no idea how that happened, but it should be fixed now. (It will take an hour or so for the fix to reac

Re: info files: duplicate entry in dir and weird filename

On 1/4/2017 12:34 PM, Christopher Crawford wrote: Also, (emacs), (elisp), (epa), (message), and (pgg) all have links to (gnupg), instead of the real file gnupg1.info.gz and (gnupg1) in (dir). Thanks for the report. I'll fix it in the next release of emacs. Ken -- Problem reports: htt

Re: info-6.1 segmentation fault

On 3/3/2016 3:31 PM, Ken Brown wrote: On 3/3/2016 3:00 PM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: I have just found the cause: From strace output it can be observed that version 6.1 get an access violation exception after trying to read from the .infokey file. And then, info-6.1 crashes if the .infokey file c

Re: info-6.1 segmentation fault

On 3/3/2016 3:00 PM, Mikhail Usenko wrote: I have just found the cause: From strace output it can be observed that version 6.1 get an access violation exception after trying to read from the .infokey file. And then, info-6.1 crashes if the .infokey file contains the lines that disable the defa

Re: info-6.1 segmentation fault

On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 15:46:02 + (UTC) Achim Gratz <...> wrote: > Mikhail Usenko inbox.ru> writes: > > info 6.1 crashes to segmentation fault on every run. > > Downgarding to version 6.0 resolves the problem. > > Does anyone come across with this or it is my local issue? > > WJFFM. Local issue

Re: info-6.1 segmentation fault

Mikhail Usenko inbox.ru> writes: > info 6.1 crashes to segmentation fault on every run. > Downgarding to version 6.0 resolves the problem. > Does anyone come across with this or it is my local issue? WJFFM. Local issue or some interaction with your environment is most likely. Have you run cygch

Re: INFO issues [more or less fully SOLVED]

Hi all... ... replying from the list archives. Relevant backward references are: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-09/msg00091.html from myself http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-09/msg00092.html from fernando http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-09/msg00099.html from Ken Brown http://cygwin.com/m

Re: INFO issues [partially SOLVED]

It would be nice to know if yours is a x86_64 version of cygwin because I think there is something wrong in x86_64 version and this must be a bug somewhere. Don't know exactly where (the texinfo package?). I have a x86_64 and I can confirm the update-info-dir post install script is not availab

Re: Info for the item "does patch.exe work different than other unx patch tools?" (i.e. "hunk 1 out of 3 hunks failed")

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Thomas Höhenleitner wrote: Please do not top post. > Thanks a lot, Earnie, > > for your answer. I do not know whitch patch command line switch do you > mean. With -l I had already tried. I should have said diff instead of patch. --strip-trailing-cr -- Earnie -

RE: Info for the item "does patch.exe work different than other unx patch tools?" (i.e. "hunk 1 out of 3 hunks failed")

Thomas Höhenleitner wrote: > >2012/11/8 Thomas Höhenleitner >: >> >> 2012/11/8 Ryan Johnson >: >> Per , please don't include raw email addresses in your replies. This mailing list is archived online, and we'd rather not feed the spammers. See also http://cygwin.c

Re: Info for the item "does patch.exe work different than other unx patch tools?" (i.e. "hunk 1 out of 3 hunks failed")

May be because of the attatched file the mail before is not delivered.. Here is a temporary link to the attached file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/7etntr4jukp9t5l/ExamplePatch.zip 2012/11/8 Thomas Höhenleitner : > Hello Ryan, > > first I appologize for the wrong hunks-failed info. I did not remebe

Re: Info for the item "does patch.exe work different than other unx patch tools?" (i.e. "hunk 1 out of 3 hunks failed")

Thanks a lot, Earnie, for your answer. I do not know whitch patch command line switch do you mean. With -l I had already tried. In my answer to Ryan follows an example, I created. Bes regards, Thomas 2012/11/8 Earnie Boyd : > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Thomas Höhenleitner wrote: > >> >> So

Re: Info for the item "does patch.exe work different than other unx patch tools?" (i.e. "hunk 1 out of 3 hunks failed")

On 08/11/2012 5:30 AM, Thomas Höhenleitner wrote: Hello, using Cygwin patch.exe in a batch file I ran into the problem that patch failed for some reason ("hunk 1 out of 3 hunks failed"): Investigating this issue I found that inserting "unix2dos my.patch" before applying the patch was my friend!

Re: Info for the item "does patch.exe work different than other unx patch tools?" (i.e. "hunk 1 out of 3 hunks failed")

On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Thomas Höhenleitner wrote: > > So now I had a closer look to the diff generated my.patch file and I > found out, that the file had somehow hybrid line endings: > * the header with the file names was unix-like > * the body with the diff info was dos-like > > The reas

Re: 'info ftp' show man page instead of info. Incorrect 'dir' file entries for 'inetutils' package.

On 7/14/2011 4:56 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote: > Problems come from incorrect '/usr/share/info/dir' file menu entry. > If I change: > > * ftp: (inetutils)ftp FTP client. > > to: > > * ftp: (inetutils)ftp invocation. FTP client. > > - all OK. Same true for many othe

Re: info -- not nearly as comprehensive as before

On 5/17/2010 11:33 AM, Rockefeller, Harry wrote: What happened to info? Most of the compiler commands are absent. CVS is still there but svn is absent, etc. Not all packages provide info files. For example, 'cygcheck -l subversion' will show you that there is no info file for svn. On the o

Re: Info about OS by command in Cygwin

Thomas Wiedmann wrote: >> Also, /usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe (Note that this is technically a >> native, not cygwin, application, so you need to strip '\r' from the >> result if you're using it in a script). > > What does the subdirectory csih stand for, i. e. what means this > abbreviation?

Re: Info about OS by command in Cygwin

Also, /usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe (Note that this is technically a native, not cygwin, application, so you need to strip '\r' from the result if you're using it in a script). What does the subdirectory csih stand for, i. e. what means this abbreviation? How to strip '\r' from the result

Re: Info about OS by command in Cygwin

Christian Franke wrote: 'uname' and '/proc/version' show the Windows version number > (NT-5.0=2000, 5.1=XP, 5.2=2003, 6.0=Vista) but not the SP version. The > 'ver' is a cmd.exe builtin command and can also be run from bash: Also, /usr/lib/csih/winProductName.exe (Note that this is technically a n

Re: Info about OS by command in Cygwin

Thomas Wiedmann wrote: by which Cygwin/bash command can I get detailed information about the Operating System, e. g. about the Windows version (XP? SP?)? Trying with the Windows command "ver" I've got the error "-bash: ver: command not found". 'uname' and '/proc/version' show the Windows versi

Re: info needed

unknown-1 wrote: Larry Hall (Cygwin cygwin.com> writes: unknown-1 wrote: You have the latest versions available with Cygwin. You can either wait for the maintainer to update the packages to the version you want or pull the source from the GTK site and build it yourself. I saw several

Re: info needed

Larry Hall (Cygwin cygwin.com> writes: > > unknown-1 wrote: > You have the latest versions available with Cygwin. You can either wait > for the maintainer to update the packages to the version you want or pull > the source from the GTK site and build it yourself. I saw several messages of

RE: info needed

>> "R" ? I was looking for source code to add to my code for doing right >> censored > non-parametric significance >> tests that I can integrate with some wavelet code. > > I have no idea. Never used R. But on the PSPP fora there is something written > about it. fwiw, if I understand this, it lo

Re: info needed

Mike Marchywka hotmail.com> writes: > I'm trying to build this right now but I'm curious to know how you think this compares to something like > "R" ? I was looking for source code to add to my code for doing right censored non-parametric significance > tests that I can integrate with some wavele

RE: info needed

I'm trying to build this right now but I'm curious to know how you think this compares to something like "R" ? I was looking for source code to add to my code for doing right censored non-parametric significance tests that I can integrate with some wavelet code. I managed to get past ./config

Re: info needed

unknown-1 wrote: Hi I am afraid I am running for the most stupid question award but I give it a try anyway. I installed Cygwin on WindowsXP with the setup program from the Cygwin.COM. I used the program yesterday to get the latest updates. Now I try to compile PSPP (a statistical package)

Re: info bash - Bash Features: No such file or directory

Eric Blake wrote: I don't know if you are reproducing the same problem as the OP, since the OP didn't exactly print what error message he was getting, but you certainly reproduced a problem. ... This is probably because you've mounted / as textmode. I don't know if it is a bug in info or

Re: info bash - Bash Features: No such file or directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Arend-Jan Westhoff on 10/22/2005 7:02 AM: >>It works for me. You'll have to help by giving me a better formula for >>reproducing the problem. What does "info -w bash" print? Also, could you >>please follow the problem-reporting directio

Re: info bash - Bash Features: No such file or directory

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Lennart Borgman on 10/19/2005 4:40 PM: > If I do > > info bash > > from the bash prompt and try to open "*Bash Features::" I get the error > message in the subject line. > > Is this expected or a known bug? It works for me. You'll ha

Re: info fails in upgrade to cygwin 1.5.18

Rolf Maier wrote: > I upgraded to Cygwin 1.5.18, now info finds virtually > nothing any longer. Here is what I see: There was a packaging error in the fftw3 packages. Remove /usr/share/info/dir and re-run /etc/postinstall/update-info-dir.sh.done to recreate it properly. Brian -- Unsubscrib

RE: INFO Death

Thanks. You guys are great and, of course, your suggestions worked. art I just noticed that 'INFO' is no longer operational. I've been trying to find out why from the mailing list and from looking at my site. No luck. Can anyone offer a suggestion as to where to look for the answer (most help

RE: INFO Death

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) > Sent: 03 November 2004 18:06 > Dave Korn wrote: > > Should it perhaps say > > > > > for d in /usr/info /usr/share/info ${INFOPATH} do > > Aha! So THAT'S what happened to my info directory! I > hadn't real

RE: INFO Death

Dave Korn wrote: > Should it perhaps say > > > for d in /usr/info /usr/share/info ${INFOPATH} do Aha! So THAT'S what happened to my info directory! I hadn't really looked into it, since usually I just type "info bletch" anyway. I ran a modified version of that script and it's back to normal now.

RE: INFO Death

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase > Sent: 03 November 2004 09:31 > Arthur I Schwarz wrote: > > Symptoms: > >>> info info > >info: dir: No such file or directory > > Reinstall the _update_info_dir package or run: > $ sh /etc/postinstall/update-

Re: INFO Death

Arthur I Schwarz wrote: I just noticed that 'INFO' is no longer operational. I've been trying to find out why from the mailing list and from looking at my site. No luck. Can anyone offer a suggestion as to where to look for the answer (most helpful) or how to fix the problem (very useful). Thanks A

RE: [INFO] Adding "cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

> On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:02:28PM -0400, Jean-Sebastien > Trottier wrote: > >Hi guys, > > > >Just to add my 2 dimes, here's what I use: > > You're quoting my email. Are you volunteering to provide a > package? If so, the list to send your package information to > is cygwin-apps. People th

Re: [INFO] Adding 'cygwin here' to Windows Explorer

>>>But, regardless, I don't see any reason to debate this. I would like a >>>package and would appreciate it if someone would provide one. If changes are required to support this functionality in /etc/profile (or any of the other startup scripts) just let me know. J. -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: [INFO] Adding "cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:02:28PM -0400, Jean-Sebastien Trottier wrote: >Hi guys, > >Just to add my 2 dimes, here's what I use: You're quoting my email. Are you volunteering to provide a package? If so, the list to send your package information to is cygwin-apps. People there can help you pull

Re: [INFO] Adding "cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

Hi guys, Just to add my 2 dimes, here's what I use: Registry: [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Folder\shell\cygshell] @="Cygwin Shell Here" [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Folder\shell\cygshell\command] @="c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\bin\\run.exe /usr/bin/sh.exe /usr/local/bin/cygwin-shell-here \"%l\"" Add co

Re: [INFO] Adding "cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

Christopher Faylor schrieb: Is there any chance that this could be rolled into a package so that we don't have to rehash it every few weeks. This discussion really is getting rather old. If it is something that people just have to have, then can someone roll it into a package and get it into the

Re: [INFO] Adding "cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

Is there any chance that this could be rolled into a package so that we don't have to rehash it every few weeks. This discussion really is getting rather old. If it is something that people just have to have, then can someone roll it into a package and get it into the distribution? cgf -- Unsub

Re: [INFO] Adding "Cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

Henry S. Thompson schrieb: 1) In the registry entry: C:\cygwin\bin\rxvt.exe -fn 'Lucida Console-11' -geometry 80x48 -sl 300 -cr '#8b4513' -bg '#f0' -e /usr/bin/bash -c "XXX=\"%1\" bash --login -i" 2) In my .bash_profile if [[ "x$XXX" != "x" ]] then cd "$XXX" unset XXX fi Thi

Re: [INFO] Adding "Cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

kurtz writes: > Thorsten Kampe escribió: > >> [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Folder\shell\command\command] >> @="C:\\cygwin\\bin\\rxvt.exe -e /bin/zsh --login -i -s \"%1\"" >> and... >> if [[ $OSTYPE = cygwin && $ARGC = 1 ]]; then cd $@; fi > > I set bash instead of zsh, and try to use $# instead of $ARG

Re: [INFO] Adding "Cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

Thorsten Kampe escribió: [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Folder\shell\command\command] @="C:\\cygwin\\bin\\rxvt.exe -e /bin/zsh --login -i -s \"%1\"" and... if [[ $OSTYPE = cygwin && $ARGC = 1 ]]; then cd $@; fi I set bash instead of zsh, and try to use $# instead of $ARGC, in my .bashrc. There, $# always

Re: [INFO] Adding "Cygwin here" to Windows Explorer

* Tero Niemela (2004-09-14 19:06 +0200) > some of you may find this useful. I did the following, > works perfectly for me: > > Last line of ~/.zlogin is: > > [[ "$OSTYPE" = *cygwin* && $ARGC -eq 1 ]] && cd "$@" > > And this registry settings was added to Windows > registry: > > Windows Registry

Re: Info: resolving vtable ... (auto-import)

At 04:43 PM 8/19/2004, you wrote: >Tried resolving this by searching mailing list archives, but no luck. Here's >my question: > >After linking on Win32, I get a number of these types of messages: > >Info: resolving vtable for SomeFunctionName linking to >__imp___ZTV13SomeFunctionName (auto-impor

Re: Info: resolving vtable ... (auto-import)

There was some discussion about this relatively recently. I can't seem to locate the message right now. If I recall correctly, these messages happen whenever a virtual table has to be created and someone knowledgeable(not me!) said not to worry about it. It had something to do with a change in bi

Re: 'info' observations and questions

At 03:33 PM 1/19/2004, Doug Wyatt you wrote: >I don't know where the info.exe source is - doing a setup >package search for info or info.exe does not seem to be >helpful in locating it. Any hints? Sure. HTH, -- Larry Hall

Re: Info and Document Path

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, David A. Cobb wrote: > I googled about looking for an answer, all I see is a very short thread > between Chuck and Chris on > . > > Is the policy that documentation and info is moving into /usr/share/...? > If yes, is

RE: Info versus Man

From: Joshua Daniel Franklin Sent: 10 November 2003 18:31 > $ grep CLEAR /etc/pinforc > CLEAR-SCREEN-AT-EXIT=true > > It's amazing! Strangely enough I had actually done 'pinfo pinfo' ... and I tried 'pinfo -x pinfo' as a test and it didn't work. Several times. As I just tried it again and it _did

Re: Info versus Man

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:34:20 -0500 (EST), Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >While I'd recommend 'pinfo' over 'info' any day, pinfo appears 2 behave differently than info, for instance i cant get menu mode to work, can't get ? or h to work. zzapper -- vim -c ":%s/^/WhfgTNabgureRIvz

Re: Info versus Man

On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 10:41:45AM -, Hughes, Bill wrote: > > Try pinfo. If it doesn't find an info page it'll look for a man page. > > Except that under rxvt pinfo leaves the data on the screen where info and > man leave you back where you started. In a console it does what I would > expect.

Re: Info versus Man

While I'd recommend 'pinfo' over 'info' any day, to be fair to 'info', it also displays man pages if the info pages can't be found. Also, while we're on the subject of info vs man, man pages are much better for global search, while info is better for structured delivery of information. FWIW, I use

RE: Info versus Man

Sent: 09 November 2003 21:48 From: Don Sharp > Try pinfo. If it doesn't find an info page it'll look for a man page. Except that under rxvt pinfo leaves the data on the screen where info and man leave you back where you started. In a console it does what I would expect. So (for me) the choice is b

Re: Info versus Man

Try pinfo. If it doesn't find an info page it'll look for a man page. HTH Don Sharp Brian Dessent wrote: > > zzapper wrote: > > > > Hi Ya All > > > > Is INFO just a viewer for Man Pages, or does it have it's own > > database? > > > > Is INFO preferred to MAN ?? > > > > (Sorry for hogging this N

Re: Info versus Man

zzapper wrote: > > Hi Ya All > > Is INFO just a viewer for Man Pages, or does it have it's own > database? > > Is INFO preferred to MAN ?? > > (Sorry for hogging this NG recently) > zzapper Yes, they are completely seperate. The 'info' program reads and displays texinfo documents, which live

Re: Info

On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 11:31:28AM -0500, Larry Johnson at 066 wrote: >Thank you kind sir. I certainly appreciate your assistance. I am not a >Linux Guru, although some have referred to me as a M$ geek. I know a thing >or three. I have come to like Linux more'n more over the last few years. I

Re: Info

If you are teaching a class on RedHat Linux 9, why would you use CygWin? They aren't the same by a long shot. If you were teaching a class on the GNU toolchain, then CygWin is ideal. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/probl

RE: Info

anski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 11:05 AM To: Larry Johnson at 066 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: Info On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, it was written: > I am a professor @ ITT Tech in Omaha Nebraska. If you look @ a map of > the USA, pick the center m

Re: Info

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, it was written: > I am a professor @ ITT Tech in Omaha Nebraska. If you look @ a map of > the USA, pick the center most spot. That'll put you pretty close. In > any case, my point. I'm interested in this CygWin software for a class > on RedHat Linux 9. I don't see any thi

Re: info is not loading...

gt; - Original Message - > From: "Joshua Daniel Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 5:43 PM > Subject: Re: info is not loading... > &g

Re: info is not loading...

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:16:16AM -0800, Eduardo Osorio Armenta wrote: > > I have some troubles with > info > > a lot of packages show their information > but not the all > that i have under > /usr/info > > for example binutils.info Eduardo, This happens because some misbehaved packages over

RE: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

> > Interesting. The history is a little garbled (Steve Chamberlain didn't name > > the project "Cygwin" and there was no magical decision made in 1999 to do > > anything) but it's always nice to get exposure. > > > Perhaps you should send a correction to this magazine :-) I think I have not the

RE: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

> I *believe* (not reading German ;) that the same article > is also in the English edition. > You're right. See http://www.linux-magazine.com/issue/26, but it seems that you can find only the german story in the internet. Ralf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple B

RE: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

> From: Christopher Faylor > >See > http://www.linux-magazin.de/Artikel/ausgabe/2002/12/cygwin/cygwin.html for > >further informations. > I *believe* (not reading German ;) that the same article is also in the English edition. J. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simp

RE: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

> Interesting. The history is a little garbled (Steve Chamberlain didn't name > the project "Cygwin" and there was no magical decision made in 1999 to do > anything) but it's always nice to get exposure. > Perhaps you should send a correction to this magazine :-) Ralf -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: Info - cygwin articel in german linux magazine

On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 10:28:43AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: >Hi all, > >today I've found an interesting article about cygwin, cygwin/xfree and relating >topics in a german magazine. > >See http://www.linux-magazin.de/Artikel/ausgabe/2002/12/cygwin/cygwin.html for >further informations. Interest

Re: info

Hey There! Are you a guy? Do you ever worry that your penis isn't as large as it could be? Maybe you've considered buying a pump? Well, the pump WILL make your penis bigger, that is a fact. But what if you want to do something with your penis besides leave it in a tube? In that case you're ba

Re: info

Hey There! Are you a guy? Do you ever worry that your penis isn't as large as it could be? Maybe you've considered buying a pump? Well, the pump WILL make your penis bigger, that is a fact. But what if you want to do something with your penis besides leave it in a tube? In that case you're ba

Re: info please

I think you can check the kernel to-do list, and consult the developer area of the cygwin project web page: http://www.cygwin.com - Original Message - From: "alex bohemia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:38 AM Subject: info please > hello my