RE: __cygwin__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root)

2003-09-25 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)
> From: Igor Pechtchanski > On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > > > > From: Christopher Faylor > > > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen > > > (garbage mail) wrote: > > > > > >I've been thinking that there is a need for a __NOCYGWIN__ >

RE: __cygwin__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root)

2003-09-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > > From: Christopher Faylor > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen > > (garbage mail) wrote: > > > >I've been thinking that there is a need for a __NOCYGWIN__ > > define too (to > > >be set when -mno-cyg

RE: __cygwin__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root)

2003-09-24 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)
> From: Christopher Faylor > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen > (garbage mail) wrote: > >I've been thinking that there is a need for a __NOCYGWIN__ > define too (to > >be set when -mno-cygwin is used). > >Any thoughts about this? Good(tm) or Bad(tm)? > > Bad. > > Rat

Re: __cygwin__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root)

2003-09-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 09:21:38PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: >> From: Corinna Vinschen > >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:41:59PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen >> (garbage mail) wrote: >> > Current status as I've understood it is; As -mno-cygwin _ISN'T_ used >> > __CYGWIN__ and

Google (Was: Re: __CYGWIN__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root))

2003-09-24 Thread Rolf Campbell
Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: Searching the archives, w google (I'm VERY negative vs "htdig" right now) +"CYGWIN" +"-mno-cygwin" site:cygwin.com inurl:ml gives 1450 hits... I'm out of ideas on how to refine this - to find anything that matches __NOCYGWIN__ or similar. At times

RE: __CYGWIN__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root)

2003-09-24 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)
> From: Corinna Vinschen > On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:41:59PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen > (garbage mail) wrote: > > Current status as I've understood it is; As -mno-cygwin _ISN'T_ used > > __CYGWIN__ and __CYGWIN32__ both will be #define 'd. > > > > Now the big Q: What is the difference between

Re: __CYGWIN__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root)

2003-09-24 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 08:41:59PM +0200, Hannu E K Nevalainen (garbage mail) wrote: > Current status as I've understood it is; As -mno-cygwin _ISN'T_ used > __CYGWIN__ and __CYGWIN32__ both will be #define 'd. > > Now the big Q: What is the difference between those? __CYGWIN__ is the correct on

__CYGWIN__ ++ (RE: getuid() and root)

2003-09-23 Thread Hannu E K Nevalainen \(garbage mail\)
> From: Corinna Vinschen > Remove (or better ifdef out) all checks for the root user account. > sshd is using the same approach. We don't have a root user > concept so far so these test are a bit displaced on Cygwin. Sorry to butt in again... :-P This is just to make things clear up a bit for

Re: getuid() and root

2003-09-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:44:22AM -0400, Kevin Van Workum wrote: > I'm trying to compile SOpenPBS on Cygwin. SOpenPBS is the Scalable Open > Portable Batch System (www.supercluster.org). And I need some advice. > > I have it compiled and running, with some ugly hacks. First, the daemons > want to