Yaakov (Cygwin/X) writes:
> Actually, the RIGHT thing to do is to have Perl (updated to 5.14.4
> and) built without the CC=gcc-4 hack.
Oh, absolutely. But until we have that, if anyone runs into troubles
that some program which hasn't been rebuilt since the gcc update is
unable to find a C compil
On 2013-11-01 15:44, Achim Gratz wrote:
Andrey Repin writes:
The package gcc4-core provides a compatibility symlink for programs that
expect the old gcc naming scheme (like Perl). The link however is just
"gcc4", while Devel::CheckLib for instance looks for "gcc4.exe".
Report that to the main
Andrey Repin writes:
>> The package gcc4-core provides a compatibility symlink for programs that
>> expect the old gcc naming scheme (like Perl). The link however is just
>> "gcc4", while Devel::CheckLib for instance looks for "gcc4.exe".
>
> Report that to the maintainer of Devel::CheckLib
> It S
Greetings, Achim Gratz!
> The package gcc4-core provides a compatibility symlink for programs that
> expect the old gcc naming scheme (like Perl). The link however is just
> "gcc4", while Devel::CheckLib for instance looks for "gcc4.exe".
Report that to the maintainer of Devel::CheckLib
It SHOUL
4 matches
Mail list logo
