Re: gcc-4 is broken on both cygwin-1.5 and cygwin-1.7

2009-06-24 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 24/06/2009 13:09, Eray Ozkural wrote: It cost me a lot of time but I verified that gcc-4 is malfunctioning on both versions. I think I can safely say that gcc-4.3 is working just fine, having used it to build hundreds of packages, both C and C++. It's impossible to build boost-1.38 or bu

Re: gcc-4 is broken on both cygwin-1.5 and cygwin-1.7

2009-06-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:09:52PM +0300, Eray Ozkural wrote: >It cost me a lot of time but I verified that gcc-4 is malfunctioning >on both versions. > >It's impossible to build boost-1.38 or build-1.39, even if you build >only static libs. > >I had to use the gcc 4 that I had built myself previou

Re: gcc-4 is broken on both cygwin-1.5 and cygwin-1.7

2009-06-24 Thread Dave Korn
Eray Ozkural wrote: > It cost me a lot of time but I verified that gcc-4 is malfunctioning > on both versions. It is possible you have actually verified what you think you have verified, but you give no details so it's impossible to evaluate your methodology. > It's impossible to build boost-1.