Re: gawk: regression with unary plus

On Feb 5 13:05, Houder wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 14:59:30, Steven Penny wrote: > > Previously conversions could be triggered by either adding zero (+0), unary > > plus (+) or unary minus (-) [1]: > [snip] > > > However now conversion only happens with adding zero and unary minus: > [snip] > >

Re: gawk: regression with unary plus

On Sun, 04 Feb 2018 14:59:30, Steven Penny wrote: > Previously conversions could be triggered by either adding zero (+0), unary > plus (+) or unary minus (-) [1]: [snip] > However now conversion only happens with adding zero and unary minus: [snip] > Does anyone know where this change was mention