On 2021-07-02 22:33, Robert McBroom wrote:
On 7/2/21 5:58 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2021-07-02 15:21, mcforum wrote:
The legends in the heading for emacs have turned into boxes. the text
in buffers is normal.
What interaction is causing this? The X11 emacs is unusable emacs
-w32 works.
If y
On 7/3/2021 12:28 AM, Robert McBroom wrote:
On 7/2/21 5:46 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 7/2/2021 5:21 PM, mcforum wrote:
The legends in the heading for emacs have turned into boxes. the text in
buffers is normal.
I'm not sure what you mean by "legends in the heading". And when you say
On 7/2/21 5:58 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2021-07-02 15:21, mcforum wrote:
The legends in the heading for emacs have turned into boxes. the text
in buffers is normal.
What interaction is causing this? The X11 emacs is unusable emacs
-w32 works.
If you were using Windows fonts in Emacs, that c
On 7/2/21 5:46 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 7/2/2021 5:21 PM, mcforum wrote:
The legends in the heading for emacs have turned into boxes. the text
in buffers is normal.
I'm not sure what you mean by "legends in the heading". And when you
say "have turned into boxes", are you saying tha
On 2021-07-02 15:21, mcforum wrote:
The legends in the heading for emacs have turned into boxes. the text in
buffers is normal.
What interaction is causing this? The X11 emacs is unusable emacs -w32 works.
If you were using Windows fonts in Emacs, that could be caused by
Windows packages that
On 7/2/2021 5:21 PM, mcforum wrote:
The legends in the heading for emacs have turned into boxes. the text in
buffers is normal.
I'm not sure what you mean by "legends in the heading". And when you say "have
turned into boxes", are you saying that the problem just recently started? Or
have
On 7/11/2016 9:55 AM, Duncan Roe wrote:
Hi
When upgrading to current 5.2.1 Cygwin, this message appears in the window:
Package: z/Perpetual
zp_fontconfig_cache_1.sh exit code 1
The relevant lines in /var/log/setup.log.full appear to be:
2016/07/11 22:24:30 running: C:\cygwin64\bin\bash.e
On 2016-04-18 04:44, Marco Atzeri wrote:
I rebuilt plotutils, and now there is no postinstall script,
however it seems the tekfont*.pcf fonts are not recognized
by fontconfig.
That is to be expected; fontconfig disables bitmap fonts by default.
More importantly, plotutils does not have a depen
On 17/04/2016 21:01, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-04-17 13:26, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Most of the postinstall font scripts are referring to
/usr/share/fonts/encodings
/usr/share/fonts/encodings/large
"Most"?
just fooled by the old postinstall files (.done)
$ cat plotutils.sh.done
/u
On 2016-04-17 13:26, Marco Atzeri wrote:
Most of the postinstall font scripts are referring to
/usr/share/fonts/encodings
/usr/share/fonts/encodings/large
"Most"?
$ cat plotutils.sh.done
/usr/bin/rm -f /usr/share/fonts/misc/encodings.dir
/usr/share/fonts/misc/fonts.{dir,scale}
/usr/bin/
>-Original Message-
>From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com [mailto:cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of
>Yaakov Selkowitz
>Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 10:37 AM
>To: cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: Re: font faq
>
>On 2016-03-14 09:54, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
>>
On 2016-03-14 09:54, Rockefeller, Harry wrote:
I have had warnings and errors about fonts ever since - something changed.
I'm looking at the index of Cygwin FAQ and there is not a single question
matching 'font'.
Where do I need to go to match up my font issue (warning or error) on a
particul
On 9/11/2014 6:21 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
Achim Gratz wrote:
Both fonts you use as an example exist in multiple versions with
differing UTF-8 support. If they don't have that glyph (which is
likely, given the results you report), then Emacs would try to get it
from another font with the sam
Greetings, Sebastien Vauban!
>>> The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to
>>> Emacs.
>>>
>>> But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same
>>> range of characters in both worlds?
>>
>> You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Sebastien Vauban writes:
>> The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to
>> Emacs.
>>
>> But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same
>> range of characters in both worlds?
>
> You seem to assume that those fonts define that p
Sebastien Vauban writes:
> The problem would be with Cygwin in general, then, if not limited to
> Emacs.
>
> But why the same fonts (Consolas, Lucida Console) don't display the same
> range of characters in both worlds?
You seem to assume that those fonts define that particular glyph. Both
fonts
On 10/09/2014 19:49, Ken Brown wrote:
On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
Hello,
As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of
Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing
triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts:
- win32 Emacs always can di
Hello,
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>> As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of
>> Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing
>> triangle coherently for the same fonts:
>>
>> - win32 Emacs always can display it, in
On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
Hello,
As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of
Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing
triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts:
- win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts,
- Cygwin Emacs
Hello,
Ken Brown wrote:
> On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>> As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of
>> Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing
>> triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts:
>>
>> - win32 Emacs always can display it
On 9/3/2014 8:41 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
Hello,
As you can see on http://screencast.com/t/XTTv9DSAC, win32 binaries of
Emacs and Cygwin Emacs can't display the white right-pointing
triangle [1] coherently for the same fonts:
- win32 Emacs always can display it, in all fonts,
- Cygwin Emac
Ken Brown-6 wrote:
>
> [This should have gone to the cygwin-xfree list. I've set the reply-to
> accordingly.]
>
Sorry... I wasn't sure whether it was emacs or X.
I reply via nabble: hope it will follow the reply-to.
> This is a result of the change in the default server DPI announced in
>
On 4/29/2010 2:07 PM, Marc Girod wrote:
I just thought I'd add my /var/log/XWin.0.log file, which contains my X
startup string...
The complete startup string, from /Emacs.bat, is:
bash --login -c "/usr/bin/startx /usr/bin/emacs -g 90x37+150+0 -- /usr/bin/X
:0 -multiwindow -clipboard"
Please s
I just thought I'd add my /var/log/XWin.0.log file, which contains my X
startup string...
The complete startup string, from /Emacs.bat, is:
bash --login -c "/usr/bin/startx /usr/bin/emacs -g 90x37+150+0 -- /usr/bin/X
:0 -multiwindow -clipboard"
Thanks,
Marc
http://old.nabble.com/file/p28403944/X
[This should have gone to the cygwin-xfree list. I've set the reply-to
accordingly.]
On 4/29/2010 1:55 PM, Marc Girod wrote:
Hello,
I just upgraded for the first time for a few months.
Starting my Gnu emacs under X11, I notice that my font (and frames) is
larger than previously, by a factor
day, Cary Jamison said:
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 14:58:41 -0700
From: Cary Jamison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: font
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrew DeFaria typed:
Cary Jamison wrote:
I'm always surprised at how many people recommened using rxvt. I use
it o
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrew DeFaria typed:
> Cary Jamison wrote:
>
>> I'm always surprised at how many people recommened using rxvt. I use
>> it once in a while, but there's just too many things I do don't work
>> right unless I'm using the regular Win32 console. Output is delayed
>> until th
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> Too many things? Other than I/O (which I agree is important)
> of certain Windows only programs what else does rxvt do wrong?
This is getting a bit off-topic, but one thing that
bothers me is "normal" resizing under Windows. I'd
rather it behave like it does under X (and co
Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Rxvt.font1: "Lucida Console-10"
Rxvt.font2: "Lucida Console-13"
Rxvt.font: "Lucida Console-16"
...
What do these do?
font sets the default font. The others set alternate fonts like the
ones you normally get on the right mouse butt
Cary Jamison wrote:
I'm always surprised at how many people recommened using rxvt. I use
it once in a while, but there's just too many things I do don't work
right unless I'm using the regular Win32 console. Output is delayed
until the
process exits, input is ignored, etc., etc.
Too many th
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> Rxvt.font1: "Lucida Console-10"
>> Rxvt.font2: "Lucida Console-13"
>> Rxvt.font: "Lucida Console-16"
...
> What do these do?
font sets the default font. The others set alternate fonts like the
ones you normally get on the right mouse button in xterms. At least
in my config
In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) typed:
> Chris Taylor wrote:
>> Yes. Don't use the cmd-based cygwin interface.
>> Use rxvt.
>
> Agreed. However, expect the occasional surprise when
> running non-Cygwin console binaries since they won't
> recognize that they are running on a te
Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Rxvt.font1: "Lucida Console-10"
Rxvt.font2: "Lucida Console-13"
Rxvt.font: "Lucida Console-16"
Rxvt.font3: "Lucida Console-19"
Rxvt.font4: "Lucida Console-22"
Rxvt.font5: "Lucida Console-25"
Rxvt.font6: "Lucida Console-28"
What do these do?
--
If it's zero deg
Chris Taylor wrote:
> Yes. Don't use the cmd-based cygwin interface.
> Use rxvt.
Agreed. However, expect the occasional surprise when
running non-Cygwin console binaries since they won't
recognize that they are running on a terminal. I use
a Tcl-based debugger at work, and when running it in
Win32
Oliver Vecernik wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to use Courier New as font for Cygwin, but the only choices
I've got are Lucida Console and Rasterschriftart. One solution is to use
PuTTY to connect via ssh to localhost, but I think this is a bit of
overkill. Is there another posiibility?
Yes. Don't use t
Oliver Vecernik wrote:
> I'd like to use Courier New as font for Cygwin, but the only choices
> I've got are Lucida Console and Rasterschriftart. One solution is to use
> PuTTY to connect via ssh to localhost, but I think this is a bit of
> overkill. Is there another posiibility?
You seem to be r
> Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> > Igor Pechtchanski writes:
>>
>> > setup is somehow failing in its dependency tracking. Alternatively,
>> > why not make 'gv' invoke '/usr/X11R6/bin/gs' explicitly, instead of
>> > searc
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > Igor Pechtchanski writes:
>
> > setup is somehow failing in its dependency tracking. Alternatively,
> > why not make 'gv' invoke '/usr/X11R6/bin/gs' explicitly, instead of
> > searching for it in the PATH?
>
> I'm not sure, there was talk before
> Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> setup is somehow failing in its dependency tracking. Alternatively, why
> not make 'gv' invoke '/usr/X11R6/bin/gs' explicitly, instead of searching
> for it in the PATH?
I'm not sure, there was talk before that eventually the /usr/X11R6/
hierarchy wi
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> > Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
>
> > Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
> >> Make sure you have the x11 version of ghostscript installed.
>
> > It's about time this is added to the FAQ, don't you think?
>
> I'm also thinking about releasing a new versi
> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>> Make sure you have the x11 version of ghostscript installed.
> It's about time this is added to the FAQ, don't you think?
I'm also thinking about releasing a new version of gv with a new
README, if it helps.
> Yaakov
Ci
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Make sure you have the x11 version of ghostscript installed.
It's about time this is added to the FAQ, don't you think?
Yaakov
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http
Rotaiv,
This has now acquired the status of a perennial question, so searching the
archives will yield several informative messages. Also, if you read the man
page, then you must not have read it very carefully, because it's quite
clear about setting the fonts. It won't explain the funkiness w
43 matches
Mail list logo
