Ruprecht Machleidt wrote:
This is to ask if the problems with cygwin on Vista
have by now all been straightened out.
Or to be more concret:
If one wants to install cygwin on Vista,
can one just click on the usual "Install or update now"
and get the right stuff that is also compatible with Vista?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roelf Renkema wrote:
> zzapper wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:37:58PM +0100, Dirk Kapusta wrote:
Does the latest cygwin dll (1.5.24-2) work on Windows Vista (3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
zzapper wrote:
> Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:37:58PM +0100, Dirk Kapusta wrote:
>>> Does the latest cygwin dll (1.5.24-2) work on Windows Vista (32 bit)? I
>>> use developme
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:37:58PM +0100, Dirk Kapusta wrote:
>>Does the latest cygwin dll (1.5.24-2) work on Windows Vista (32 bit)? I
>>use development tools from Altera which installs cygwin for the gnutools
>>and their
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:37:58PM +0100, Dirk Kapusta wrote:
>Does the latest cygwin dll (1.5.24-2) work on Windows Vista (32 bit)? I use
>development tools from Altera which installs cygwin for the gnutools and their
>cross compiler. The version of the cygwin1.dll that is installed with their
On Sep 20 05:33, Tim Prince wrote:
> Lapo Luchini wrote:
>
> >Tim Prince wrote:
> >
> >>I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such
> >>software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will
> >>consider Vista broken.
> >
> >
> >FWIW, it seems to run fine on
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
>I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such
>software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will
>consider Vista broken.
FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64.
(in fact, I used it for a month now)
Yes, conside
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Prince wrote:
> I am aware of that policy, that no fix will be made to support such
> software. Just thought there might be a work-around. If not, I will
> consider Vista broken.
FWIW, it seems to run fine on WinXP x64.
(in fact, I used it for a
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 18 13:27, Tim Prince wrote:
I can't get bash to run, using the standard installation. I tried all
the compatibility modes, with and without the addition of syswow64 to
the shortcut. Failure mode is different in the win9x modes from the
others. Any more su
On Sep 18 13:27, Tim Prince wrote:
> I can't get bash to run, using the standard installation. I tried all
> the compatibility modes, with and without the addition of syswow64 to
> the shortcut. Failure mode is different in the win9x modes from the
> others. Any more suggestions?
See http:/
10 matches
Mail list logo