<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: cygwin doesn't show .. in all directories
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:48:15AM +1000, David O'Shea wrote:
> >Can anyone comment on these diffs? Apart from being mes
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 01:48:15AM +1000, David O'Shea wrote:
>Can anyone comment on these diffs? Apart from being messy and not
>properly formatted at the moment and having way too many calls to
>syscall_printf(), are they okay?
Are you having email problems? I've already informed you *twice*
t
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, David O'Shea wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Can anyone comment on these diffs? Apart from being messy and not
> properly formatted at the moment and having way too many calls to
> syscall_printf(),
... they are also unnecessary. You should read *all* replies to your own
messages. Th
") == 0)
+{
+ syscall_printf ("[doshea] readdir: it's '.'");
+ dir->__d_u.__d_data.__dotdir_flags |=
__DIRENT_DOTDIR_SEEN_DOT;
+}
+ else if (strcmp(c, "..") == 0)
+{
+ syscall_p
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:31:23AM +1000, David O'Shea wrote:
>Yes, that's exactly the problem I was reporting (with FAT32 in my
>case). I managed to get a 'cygwin-snapshot' to build so I guess
>that's the first step in developing a fix. Now comes the hard part,
>figuring out how to fix the probl
st post them to this mailing list?
Regards,
David
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Cygwin doesn't
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 10:30:12AM +0100, Mark Himsley wrote:
>On 08 September 2003 00:12 -0400 Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Any snapshot greater than or equal to 2003-08-08 should have this fix
>>in it.
>^^ 8th August 2003? s/2003-08-08/2003-09-08/
Sigh. Yes.
Sorry if my typo caused pan
On 08 September 2003 00:12 -0400 Christopher Faylor wrote:
Any snapshot greater than or equal to 2003-08-08 should
have this fix in it.
^^
8th August 2003?
s/2003-08-08/2003-09-08/
--
Mark Himsley
--
Unsubscribe
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:58:22PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Do a "dir c:" and then, say, a "dir c:\tmp" and note the difference.
>Windows doesn't put a '.' and '..' in the root directories of drives.
>Cygwin uses whatever windows provides.
FWIW, after six years, it suddenly occurred to me
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 12:28:20PM +1000, David O'Shea wrote:
>I didn't see a response to this query. Can someone at least confirm
>that this appears to be a valid bug (just mount some directories and
>take a look I guess!)? Once that happens I can look at how to fix it.
>I had a quick look at th
I don't see it when I just mount to a directory (i.e. "ls -al /usr/bin"
shows "." and ".."). I do see it if I mount a drive and then "ls -al"
the newly mounted directory, regardless of the format (well NTFS or FAT,
don't know about FAT32). Looks to me like the problem occurs if the
Win32 path c
Hi all,
I didn't see a response to this query. Can someone at least confirm
that this appears to be a valid bug (just mount some directories and
take a look I guess!)? Once that happens I can look at how to fix it.
I had a quick look at the code a month ago and thought it would
probably be hard
12 matches
Mail list logo
