Re: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

Yea. I did the request. It never came through and probably just bounced again. Anyways thanks. On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:33:57 -0400, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 06:19 PM 8/9/2004, you wrote > >Thanks. It was just that I got an automated message originating from > >the mailing list

Re: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

Thanks. It was just that I got an automated message originating from the mailing list bot that a message was bounced back that originated from this mailing list. I just needed to know if someone was posting something important. On Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:16:09 -0400, Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

At 04:56 PM 8/9/2004, you wrote: >Could someone retrieve this and tell me what the contents were? Thanks. You can always check the email archives if you need to know this kind of stuff and can't for some reason get it on your own. You'll be real sorry you missed this one. ;-)

RE: Cygwin mailing list message 94978

>Could someone retrieve this and tell me what the contents were? Thanks. You can get it yourself by sending to cygwin DASH get DOT 94978 AT cygwin DOT COM but all you'll find is that it was a virus-laden email, or that somebody was reporting Same message is here: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

utomo wrote: > I can catagorize my email using [EMAIL PROTECTED] as rules. But it is a > suggestions. > In many mailing list (I guess more than 70%) they use a subject as > indicator. I think it also one of the good way to do. We did not need to > be a different, or do somethings which others did

RE: cygwin Mailing list

> Sent: 17 February 2004 16:00 From: Christopher Faylor ..snip.. > >> cygwin is not for newbies. (*evil grin*). > > > >Ooh, ooh, have we got ourselves a new catchphrase here? > CGF? Maybe even > >an acronym: "CINFN"? :-) > > Sounds good to me. Even though it's not true. I'd say that > most o

Re: cygwin Mailing list

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:51:43AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >> Now if you just think of "quality" of posts where just is said "This has >> been discussed, search archives". Well if bother to reply at all, why >> not bring some content, e.g. title of thread that discussion were. Oh >> wait...

Re: cygwin Mailing list

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 10:35:24AM +0700, utomo wrote: >In many mailing list (I guess more than 70%) they use a subject as >indicator. I think it also one of the good way to do. We did not need >to be a different, or do somethings which others did not do. Actually, we need to do what I decide to

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Jani Tiainen wrote: > Chris Jefferson wrote: > > > Gareth Pearce wrote: > >> > >> As obviously you're a mailing list professional, I'm sure you checked the > >> mailing list archives before posting on this topic. > >> > >> Hence there is no need for me to reply. > > Still, you

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

> While I do not claim any kind of authority, could I suggest perhaps a) > being a little nicer to newbies (it isn't that hard really) and b) if > you feel the need for a post without any useful content (perhaps just > saying "search the archives") to send it just to the author of the mail > in que

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

Chris Jefferson wrote: Gareth Pearce wrote: As obviously you're a mailing list professional, I'm sure you checked the mailing list archives before posting on this topic. Hence there is no need for me to reply. Still, you replied..? =) As implied by my above statement, the topic has already been d

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

Gareth Pearce wrote: As obviously you're a mailing list professional, I'm sure you checked the mailing list archives before posting on this topic. Hence there is no need for me to reply. As implied by my above statement, the topic has already been discussed. Therefore given the subject line of th

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

10:52 AM > To: utomo; 'Cygwin List' > Subject: RE: Cygwin Mailing list > > > Hi Utomo, > > Actually, this and many other arguments have already been > made and refuted > in previous rounds of discussion on this subject. I think > everyone here would app

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

--- Larry Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Utomo, > > Actually, this and many other arguments have already been made and refuted > in previous rounds of discussion on this subject. I think everyone here > would appreciate it if you would review the old threads so that you don't > rehash th

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

gt; > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hall >> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:15 AM >> To: utomo; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: Cygwin Mailing list >> >> >> At 09:

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

. Regards, Utomo > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hall > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 10:15 AM > To: utomo; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cygwin Mailing list > > > At 09:55 PM 2/16/2004, utomo

RE: Cygwin Mailing list

> > Hi, > > I suggest that cygwin mailing list add in the subject "(Cygwin)", so we > can easily identify and manage the mails which coming from cygwin > mailing list. As obviously you're a mailing list professional, I'm sure you checked the mailing list archives before posting on this topic.

Re: Cygwin Mailing list

At 09:55 PM 2/16/2004, utomo you wrote: >Hi, > >I suggest that cygwin mailing list add in the subject "(Cygwin)", so we >can easily identify and manage the mails which coming from cygwin >mailing list. Since this "suggestion" is made every once in a blue moon on this list, I won't bore those w

Re: Cygwin mailing list post "Re: Cannot delete shortcuts under windows XP"

Paul, All Cygwin-related queries should go to the Cygwin mailing list. Not only will it give you access to more expertise than any one person can provide, it also puts your question and any answers to it in the archives which, as you discovered already, can be used by others with similar problems