On Sep 25 16:24, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 26 21:03, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>Sounds like a nice idea. We should try that. I'm just not sure how
> >>>much time I have left to work on this before my vaca next month. Do you
> >>>hav
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 26 21:03, Christian Franke wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Sounds like a nice idea. We should try that. I'm just not sure how
much time I have left to work on this before my vaca next month. Do you
have fun to look into that? We have waited so long for postfix,
On Aug 27 19:57, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> >> Fixed in CVS. The idea to reopen the file by handle is still good.
> >> *Iff* there is an open handle to the file to begin with...
> >>
> >> I'm just creating a snapshot but this may take a few minutes longer
> >> than anticipate
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> Fixed in CVS. The idea to reopen the file by handle is still good.
>> *Iff* there is an open handle to the file to begin with...
>>
>> I'm just creating a snapshot but this may take a few minutes longer
>> than anticipated due to connection problems.
>
> Snapshot is up
On Aug 27 11:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 27 08:57, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > > I fixed that in CVS (and I'm just generating a snapshot). The problem
> > > was that the functions reading and writing security descriptors didn't
> > > use the special "r
On Aug 27 08:57, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > I fixed that in CVS (and I'm just generating a snapshot). The problem
> > was that the functions reading and writing security descriptors didn't
> > use the special "reopen by handle" semantics of the NtOpenFile call i
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> I fixed that in CVS (and I'm just generating a snapshot). The problem
> was that the functions reading and writing security descriptors didn't
> use the special "reopen by handle" semantics of the NtOpenFile call if
> a reopen was necessary. Rather they jus
On Aug 26 21:03, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >Sounds like a nice idea. We should try that. I'm just not sure how
> >much time I have left to work on this before my vaca next month. Do you
> >have fun to look into that? We have waited so long for postfix, I guess
> >a cou
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 22 20:32, Christian Franke wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Another potential solution might be to defer the AF_UNIX handshake to
the first send/recv:
Whatever the peers do, there is a certain protocol used. That means,
there's an implicit understanding who's goi
On Aug 22 20:32, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 21 21:14, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>Easier and may work for Postfix: Add a Cygwin specific socket option like
> >>SO_DONT_NEED_PEERCRED which is set immediately after Postfix calls
> >>socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM). If se
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 21 21:14, Christian Franke wrote:
...
Complex but may work: A fhandler_socket::listen() on a AF_UNIX/SOCK_STREAM
socket starts a thread which accept()s connections, performs the handshake
and puts the new socket descs in a queue. fhandler_socket::accept4() then no
On Aug 21 21:14, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 21 18:16, Christian Franke wrote:
> >>Corinna Vinschen wrote (in thread "[ITP] libsuexec 1.0"):
> >>>Postfix for Cygwin would be *so* nice. Sigh. ...
> >>Due to the following problem, Postfix hangs during startup (and bl
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 21 18:16, Christian Franke wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote (in thread "[ITP] libsuexec 1.0"):
Postfix for Cygwin would be *so* nice. Sigh. ...
Due to the following problem, Postfix hangs during startup (and blocks any
possible "[ITP] postfix ..."):
If a AF_UNIX
On Aug 21 18:16, Christian Franke wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote (in thread "[ITP] libsuexec 1.0"):
> >Postfix for Cygwin would be *so* nice. Sigh. ...
>
> Due to the following problem, Postfix hangs during startup (and blocks any
> possible "[ITP] postfix ..."):
>
> If a AF_UNIX socket is in
14 matches
Mail list logo