Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-09 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/09/2015 11:25 AM, David Boyce wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote: >> For now, but I may move to dash someday in the future, like Debian did. > > By “I” are you referring to a personal decision at your site or do you > mean you may exert your influence to get the defau

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-09 Thread David Boyce
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Eric Blake wrote: > For now, but I may move to dash someday in the future, like Debian did. By “I” are you referring to a personal decision at your site or do you mean you may exert your influence to get the default Cygwin /bin/sh switched to dash? -David -- Prob

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-09 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/08/2015 02:39 PM, René Berber wrote: > On 2/7/2015 5:16 PM, Helmut Karlowski wrote: > >> /usr/bin/ca-legacy contains [[-operators but has #!/bin/sh. Attached >> patch fixes it. > > In Cygwin sh & bash are the same thing. For now, but I may move to dash someday in the future, like Debian di

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-09 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 07:06 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote: > René Berber wrote: > > Don't send me copies of your replies. > > Then make that clear in your message header. > No "reply-to" = reply to "from". > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2 No, the etiquette of these lists is that you

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-08 Thread Andrey Repin
Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: cygwin@cyg….com > Subject: Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible > References: > <1715259570.20150209015515@yan….ru> > In-Reply-To: <1715259570.20150209015515@yan….ru> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > Conte

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-08 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On Sun, 2015-02-08 at 20:48 +, Helmut Karlowski wrote: > Am 08.02.2015, 20:34 Uhr, schrieb Achim Gratz: > > Helmut Karlowski writes: > >> /usr/bin/ca-legacy contains [[-operators but has #!/bin/sh. Attached > >> patch fixes it. > > > > The patch seems reversed… > > Oops. Shall I send an un-r

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-08 Thread René Berber
On 2/8/2015 4:55 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, René Berber! Don't send me copies of your replies. Thank you. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info:

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-08 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, René Berber! > On 2/7/2015 5:16 PM, Helmut Karlowski wrote: >> /usr/bin/ca-legacy contains [[-operators but has #!/bin/sh. Attached >> patch fixes it. > In Cygwin sh & bash are the same thing. Not enough of an excuse, if you ask me. > i.e. > $ /usr/bin/sh --version > GNU bash, vers

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-08 Thread René Berber
On 2/7/2015 5:16 PM, Helmut Karlowski wrote: > /usr/bin/ca-legacy contains [[-operators but has #!/bin/sh. Attached > patch fixes it. In Cygwin sh & bash are the same thing. i.e. $ /usr/bin/sh --version GNU bash, version 4.1.17(9)-release (i686-pc-cygwin) Copyright (C) 2009 Free Software Founda

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-08 Thread Helmut Karlowski
Am 08.02.2015, 20:34 Uhr, schrieb Achim Gratz: Helmut Karlowski writes: /usr/bin/ca-legacy contains [[-operators but has #!/bin/sh. Attached patch fixes it. The patch seems reversed… Oops. Shall I send an un-reversed one? Or maybe it is an upstream-issue? -Helmut -- Problem reports:

Re: ca-legacy not bourne-compatible

2015-02-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Helmut Karlowski writes: > /usr/bin/ca-legacy contains [[-operators but has #!/bin/sh. Attached patch > fixes it. The patch seems reversed… Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ Wavetables for the Terratec KOMPLEXER: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/D