Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1[Scanned]

2003-09-14 Thread Robert Collins
> > 3) Looked at postgres.exe. > > > > $ ls -l /usr/bin/postgre* > > -rwxr-x---+ 1 OwnerUsers 1985024 Aug 1 16:02 > > /usr/bin/postgres.exe > > The permissions of postgres.exe is correct in the tarball: > > $ tar -tvjf postgresql-7.3.4-1.tar.bz2 usr/bin/postgres.exe >

RE: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1[Scanned]

2003-09-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 07:03, Seth Rubin wrote: > Dunno. I just ran cygwin's standard setup (i.e. "install now" from > website). Well, If you can find out - for example by trying - then I can analyse the problem further. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1[Scanned]

2003-09-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 21:35, Jason Tishler wrote: Well, given the brief feedback on my request, I can only really guess. My WAG is that setup needs the cygwin ntsec acl conversion logic ported to it, along with some method to determine whether it should use it or not. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key ava

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-14 Thread Robert Collins
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 21:35, Jason Tishler wrote: Well, given the brief feedback on my request, I can only really guess. My WAG is that setup needs the cygwin ntsec acl conversion logic ported to it, along with some method to determine whether it should use it or not. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key ava

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-14 Thread Max Bowsher
Jason Tishler wrote: > Max, > > On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:58:07AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Jason Tishler wrote: >>> Is there any way to solve this problem without me adding a >>> postinstall script that performs a "chmod +rx" on all *.exe and >>> *.dll files installed by this packages? >> >> Y

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-14 Thread Max Bowsher
Jason Tishler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:25:43AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Seth Rubin wrote: >>> Myself (and Jason) are thinking there's an issue with the cygwin >>> setup. Maybe I'm being naive, but all this seems is an issue with >>> chmod and/or copy not being done properly on the p

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-14 Thread Jason Tishler
Rob, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:36:57PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > Well, given the brief feedback on my request, I can only really guess. Seth provided the following: On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 07:19:16PM -0400, Seth Rubin wrote: > The cygwin setup installed postgres.exe with 700 bits,

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-05 Thread Jason Tishler
Max, On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:58:07AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > > Is there any way to solve this problem without me adding a > > postinstall script that performs a "chmod +rx" on all *.exe and > > *.dll files installed by this packages? > > Yes. PTC for setup. Would th

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-04 Thread Jason Tishler
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:25:43AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: > Seth Rubin wrote: > > Myself (and Jason) are thinking there's an issue with the cygwin > > setup. Maybe I'm being naive, but all this seems is an issue with > > chmod and/or copy not being done properly on the postgres.exe file > > dur

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Seth Rubin wrote: > The cygwin setup installed postgres.exe with 700 bits, not 755 mode bits. > The tarball has 755 bits set. An extract from the tarball, with -xvf or > xpvf extracts in mode 755. > > Myself (and Jason) are thinking there's an issue with the cygwin setup. > Maybe I'm being naive,

RE: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-03 Thread Seth Rubin
in; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1 Seth Rubin wrote: > Jason suggested I forward this > > -- Seth Rubin >ThoughtProcess Techology LLC > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf

RE: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 07:03, Seth Rubin wrote: > Dunno. I just ran cygwin's standard setup (i.e. "install now" from > website). Well, If you can find out - for example by trying - then I can analyse the problem further. Cheers, Rob -- GPG key available at:

RE: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-03 Thread Seth Rubin
Dunno. I just ran cygwin's standard setup (i.e. "install now" from website). -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 3:34 AM To: Seth Rubin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-03 Thread Robert Collins
> > 3) Looked at postgres.exe. > > > > $ ls -l /usr/bin/postgre* > > -rwxr-x---+ 1 OwnerUsers 1985024 Aug 1 16:02 > > /usr/bin/postgres.exe > > The permissions of postgres.exe is correct in the tarball: > > $ tar -tvjf postgresql-7.3.4-1.tar.bz2 usr/bin/postgres.exe >

Re: bug in setup.exe for postgresql-7.3.4-1

2003-08-02 Thread Max Bowsher
Seth Rubin wrote: > Jason suggested I forward this > > -- Seth Rubin >ThoughtProcess Techology LLC > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Tishler > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003 10:46 AM > To: Seth Rubin > Cc: Pgsql-Cygwin > Subjec