Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 10:41 AM 6/23/2004, you wrote: >> You >> could send the strace file along to the list if it's not too big >> but unless it's clear where there's a problem just by looking at >> it, I certainly won't be able to help that much. I don't have W2K3 >> Server (or any Server) so I can't really deb

Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

> You > could send the strace file along to the list if it's not too big > but unless it's clear where there's a problem just by looking at > it, I certainly won't be able to help that much. I don't have W2K3 > Server (or any Server) so I can't really debug this. Did you try > Mark Bohlman's

Re: Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 10:12 AM 6/23/2004, you wrote: >> You might be right. The key is for someone seeing the problem to look >> into it or at least to provide some detailed information of the problem. >> I recommend looking at as a starting >> point for anyone interested in pur

Antwort: Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

> You might be right. The key is for someone seeing the problem to look > into it or at least to provide some detailed information of the problem. > I recommend looking at as a starting > point for anyone interested in pursuing this. I did. Look at the thread

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 04:24 AM 6/23/2004, you wrote: >>Issues using some Cygwin packages with W2K3 generally are related to >>security changes in W2K3 (i.e. the SYSTEM user has less permissions). >>This is typically only a problem for packages that run as services and >>need to switch user contexts (from SYSTEM t

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

>Issues using some Cygwin packages with W2K3 generally are related to >security changes in W2K3 (i.e. the SYSTEM user has less permissions). >This is typically only a problem for packages that run as services and >need to switch user contexts (from SYSTEM to some user). Packages "caught" >by t

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 12:24 PM 6/22/2004, you wrote: >* Jerry Whitaker (2004-06-22 17:41 +0200) >> Which version is supported under Windows 2003 Server? > >This is a FAQ... > >,--- * http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_1.html#SEC2 >| Wait a minute... Cygwin is only supported if you are paying for it, >| such as through a

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

* Jerry Whitaker (2004-06-22 17:41 +0200) > Hello. We are using Cygwin here at Publix Super Markets and are in the > process of upgrading our servers to Windows 2003 Server. > > Which version of the product is certified for Windows 2003 Server? Non. *chuckle* > Which version is supported under

Re: Windows 2003 Compatibility

At 11:41 AM 6/22/2004, you wrote: >Hello. We are using Cygwin here at Publix Super Markets and are in the >process of upgrading our servers to Windows 2003 Server. > >Which version of the product is certified for Windows 2003 Server? Which >version is supported under Windows 2003 Server? Are ther