Re: Upgraded man command

2004-11-25 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
> Reini Urban writes: > Volker, this is something for you: >http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=571 I'll try to get to it soon. Ciao Volker -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Doc

Re: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:52:37PM -0500, Harig, Mark wrote: >I submitted a bug report (#571). It mentions the possible >(unintentional) dependency. Thank you. Appreciated. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Harig, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Igor Pechtchanski > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:37 PM > Subject: RE: Upgraded man command > > Sure, but that'll only work if base-files is > reinstalled/upgraded at the > same time as the man package. If we want

Re: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Reini Urban
Harig, Mark schrieb: From: Christopher Faylor Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Upgraded man command This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin The component for the bug would be "Cygwin Applica

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Harig, Mark wrote: > > From: Christopher Faylor > > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:57 AM > > Subject: Re: Upgraded man command > > > > This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla: > > > > http://sourceware.org/bugzill

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Harig, Mark
> From: Christopher Faylor > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:57 AM > Subject: Re: Upgraded man command > > This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla: > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin > > The component for the bug wo

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
ult to man.conf, ensured the > > options matched yours and it now works. Go figure. > > > > Thanks for the help. > > > > Andy > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 2

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004, Harig, Mark wrote: > > Possibly, the following code in /etc/postinstall/man.sh > > should be changed: > > > >if [ ! -e ${datadir}/misc/man.conf ] ; then > > cp ${datadir}/misc/man.conf.default ${datadir}/misc/man.conf > > chmod 644 ${datadir}/misc/man.conf > >

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Harig, Mark
> > Possibly, the following code in /etc/postinstall/man.sh > should be changed: > >if [ ! -e ${datadir}/misc/man.conf ] ; then > cp ${datadir}/misc/man.conf.default ${datadir}/misc/man.conf > chmod 644 ${datadir}/misc/man.conf >fi > > to: > >if [ ! -e ${datadir}/misc/ma

Re: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
This seems like a good candidate for bugzilla: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi?product=cygwin The component for the bug would be "Cygwin Applications". cgf On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 11:50:59AM -0500, Harig, Mark wrote: >It's possible that he had the same problem I did, >which is that

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Andy Hall
ss -r when I was having the problem. All is well now. Andy -Original Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:32 AM To: Andy Hall Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Upgraded man command Andy, Do you have both /etc/postinstall/man.s

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Harig, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Igor Pechtchanski > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 11:32 AM > To: Andy Hall > Subject: RE: Upgraded man command > > Andy, > > Do you have both /etc/postinstall/man.sh and > /etc/postinstall/man.sh.done? > If so, then the

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-24 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
I simply copied the man.conf.default to man.conf, ensured the > options matched yours and it now works. Go figure. > > Thanks for the help. > > Andy > > -Original Message- > From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-23 Thread Andy Hall
man.conf, ensured the options matched yours and it now works. Go figure. Thanks for the help. Andy -Original Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 1:22 PM To: Andy Hall Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Upgraded man command On Tue

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-23 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
, 2004 9:46 AM > To: Andy Hall > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR>. Thanks. > Subject: Re: Upgraded man command > > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Andy Hall wrote: > > > > > I updated my cygwin system on my W2K SP4 systemto the late

RE: Upgraded man command

2004-11-23 Thread Andy Hall
Igor - Thanks for the reply. This is a complete mystery to me. See answers to your questions below. Andy -Original Message- From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 9:46 AM To: Andy Hall Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Upgraded man command

Re: Upgraded man command

2004-11-23 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Andy Hall wrote: > I updated my cygwin system on my W2K SP4 systemto the latest release of > cygwin and the man command started to display man pages as follows: > > ESC[1mNAMEESC[0m >ln - make links between files > > ESC[1mSYNOPSISESC[0m >ESC[1mln ESC[22m[ESC[4