2008/8/24 Brian Dessent:
> Reini Urban wrote:
>
>> Sure. Fixing libtool of course.
>> Mixing static and dynamic libs should be possible.
>
> I think you're missing the point of why libtool disallows it: not
> because it won't work in a specific instance, but because it is not
> portable. There is
Reini Urban wrote:
> Sure. Fixing libtool of course.
> Mixing static and dynamic libs should be possible.
I think you're missing the point of why libtool disallows it: not
because it won't work in a specific instance, but because it is not
portable. There is no fix for the fact that on some syst
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
Did you look into the root cause for this headache, libtool?
The gtk2-perl hack had nothing to do with libtool, it had to do with the
unique case of linking one Perl module against another. I was referring
to the EU::Liblist::Kid patch we disc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Reini Urban wrote:
> Did you look into the root cause for this headache, libtool?
The gtk2-perl hack had nothing to do with libtool, it had to do with the
unique case of linking one Perl module against another. I was referring
to the EU::Liblist::K
2008/8/24 Yaakov (Cygwin Ports):
> This release includes a patch, combined with perl-5.10.0-5, which allows
> the linking of Gtk2-Perl modules without further intervention. cygport
> will soon require this release for gtk2-perl.cygclass.
Did you look into the root cause for this headache, libtoo
5 matches
Mail list logo
