I'm running cygwin-1.5.25-7 now and experiencing NO performance
problems. I also upgraded to Vista SP1 (release candidate), but I don't
know if that had anything to do with it.
- Jim
On 12/9/2007 10:49 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
I have a number of data processing programs written in C in th
hanks.
> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:03:34 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: Updated: cygwin-1.5.25-5
>
> On Dec 10 08:40, Mike Marchywka wrote:
>>> I can't reproduce worse I/O performance. I tested different scenarios
>>
On Dec 10 08:40, Mike Marchywka wrote:
> > I can't reproduce worse I/O performance. I tested different scenarios
> > with lots of disc I/O and the performance was identical between 1.5.24
> > and 1.5.25 within the bounds of a performance test.
> >
>
>
> One thing I found out, after originally bla
n, 10 Dec 2007 14:28:02 +0100
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: Updated: cygwin-1.5.25-5
>
> On Dec 10 10:57, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Dec 9 10:49, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
>>> I have a number of data processing programs written in
On Dec 10 10:57, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 9 10:49, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> > I have a number of data processing programs written in C in the Cygwin
> > environment. They read data files into linked lists, analyze the data
> > and write results back out to disk.
> >
> > This new release
On Dec 9 10:49, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> I have a number of data processing programs written in C in the Cygwin
> environment. They read data files into linked lists, analyze the data
> and write results back out to disk.
>
> This new release of Cygwin is about 10x slower than 1.5.24-2, after
>
I have a number of data processing programs written in C in the Cygwin
environment. They read data files into linked lists, analyze the data
and write results back out to disk.
This new release of Cygwin is about 10x slower than 1.5.24-2, after
recompiling the programs. I went back to the older
7 matches
Mail list logo
