On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> [snip]
> And please don't create TOFU(*)(**).
> (*) top posting, full quote.
> See http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?Acronym=TOFU&Find=Find
> (**) Hi Igor, can I get an entry in the acronym list now? ;-)
You got it. If you can track dow
On Jan 31 14:24, Paolo Gesmundo wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
> not sure what you mean with 'Shebang'
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=shebang, second entry.
And please don't create TOFU(*)(**).
Corinna
(*) top posting, full quote.
See http://www.acronymfinder.com/af-query.asp?Acronym=TOFU
Hi Corinna,
not sure what you mean with 'Shebang'
Thanks
Paolo
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 1:34 PM
Subject: Re: Unable to properly execute a let statement from a shell script
On Jan 31 1
On Jan 31 12:50, Paolo Gesmundo wrote:
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> So, in cygwin for Win XP, is it possible to set my environment in such a
> way that the default shell
> is bash?
It doesn't make sense to cover easily solvable problems in your shell
script by changing sh to bash. You should
Paolo Gesmundo wrote:
Thanks for the responses.
So, in cygwin for Win XP, is it possible to set my environment in
such a way that the default shell
is bash?
I have no clue, and I am not suggesting you do this but what would be the
affect of...
cp bash.exe sh.exe
Besides the initial installation and
Paolo Gesmundo wrote:
Thanks for the responses.
So, in cygwin for Win XP, is it possible to set my environment in
such a way that the default shell
is bash?
I have no clue, and I am not suggesting you do this but what would be the
affect of...
cp bash.exe sh.exe
Besides the initial installation a
able to properly execute a let statement from a shell script
Paolo Gesmundo wrote:
I know that I could modify a.sh by adding #!/bin/bash
at the top of the file but I would need to avoid this
otherwise I have to modify too many scripts
Is there a way to run a.sh like in Case 1 and get the
proper res
Paolo Gesmundo wrote:
> I know that I could modify a.sh by adding #!/bin/bash
> at the top of the file but I would need to avoid this
> otherwise I have to modify too many scripts
>
> Is there a way to run a.sh like in Case 1 and get the
> proper result like in Case 2?
It sounds like your script
Paolo Gesmundo kirjoitti:
Hi all,
I am running bash on XP
I have a very simple script a.sh
a.sh:
export P=1
let Q=$P+1
echo P=$P
echo Q=$Q
Case 1)
If at prompt I run:
a.sh
let: not found
P=1
Q=
Case 2)
If I run:
bash a.sh
P=1
Q=2
I know that I could modify
9 matches
Mail list logo
