On Apr 22 12:10, Wayne Watson wrote:
> However, that's exactly what it says in the choice, redhat. Why don't
> you look? It's about 20 lines down in the list of download sites. There
> is no log that I know now for the gatech download. There is need to
> pursue this any longer. I'm installed. I'm d
However, that's exactly what it says in the choice, redhat. Why don't
you look? It's about 20 lines down in the list of download sites. There
is no log that I know now for the gatech download. There is need to
pursue this any longer. I'm installed. I'm done on this question of
installation.
Chris
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:30:20AM -0700, Wayne Watson wrote:
> As posted earlier, I downloaded the install via redhat/redwire, and then
> found no way to complete the install. I did get 16M of files. I went
> through the same source a few hours ago, redhat/redwire, but asked for the
> install t
gatech worked fine. I'm installed. I guess a possible lesson here is
stay away from redhat/redwire. Apparently, they have their own agenda.
Wayne Watson wrote:
As posted earlier, I downloaded the install via redhat/redwire, and
then found no way to complete the install. I did get 16M of files.
Wayne Watson wrote:
As posted earlier, I downloaded the install via redhat/redwire, and then
found no way to complete the install. I did get 16M of files. I went
through the same source a few hours ago, redhat/redwire, but asked for
the install to be carried out via the internet, no download ch
5 matches
Mail list logo
