> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> >> I'll go you one better Max: a combined bat/perl script that
> >> downloads and installs a snapshot. Attached is what I use to
> >> install the latest snapshots; put it anywhere (rename it to ".bat",
> >> I had to get it through Outlook), MAKE SURE YOU DON'T HAVE AN
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> I'll go you one better Max: a combined bat/perl script that
>> downloads and installs a snapshot. Attached is what I use to
>> install the latest snapshots; put it anywhere (rename it to ".bat",
>> I had to get it through Outlook), MAKE SURE YOU DON'T HAVE ANY
>> CYGWI
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> > Of Max Bowsher
> > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:28 PM
> > To: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Testsuite
> >
> >
> > Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > > BTW: is there any way to get
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Max Bowsher
> Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 12:28 PM
> To: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Testsuite
>
>
> Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > BTW: is there any way to get the "c
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> BTW: is there any way to get the "current" or "latest" snapshot with a
> simple wget? (i.e. is there a
> http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/latest...?) It would make it easier
> to make a "snapshot" target and get the new-cygwin1.dll from there :)
Not currently. If yo
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are
> > attached.
> >
> > # of expected passes240
> > # of unexpected failures1
> > # of une
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 05:12:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
>> The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are
>> attached.
>>
>> # of expected passes240
>> # of unexpected failures
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:52:07PM +0100, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> The results with cygwin-1.3.20-1 and with the latest snapshot are
> attached.
>
> # of expected passes240
> # of unexpected failures1
> # of unexpected successes 3
> # of expected failures
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > There is no *need* for a separate package - but it would make life
> > easier for those who want to help regression testing.
> And it would be extra work for Chris. I don't think performing a CVS
> check
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> There is no *need* for a separate package - but it would make life easier
> for those who want to help regression testing.
And it would be extra work for Chris. I don't think performing a CVS
checkout is that hard.
> I never said it was a neces
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
[snipped Igor's reply - already replied]
> A few extra observations: You can't just run the testsuite on the
> installed version of cygwin. It is meant to be run against
> winsup/new-cygwin1.dll. So how do you work around that? Extract the
> source
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > Please try the latest cygwin snapshot and report any problems or successes
> > > here. The latest snapshot may be close to cygwin 1.3.21.
> > I
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:40:26PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>1) Starting now I'm introducing a new policy regarding Cygwin list
> acronyms: If the acronym used is known, I'll add it to the OLOCA (and
> there is no need to expand it). If it's a newly invented one, I won't
> add it to t
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Please try the latest cygwin snapshot and report any problems or successes
> > here. The latest snapshot may be close to cygwin 1.3.21.
> I would *love* to do that, but I have a WIBGI (Wouldn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
