Shankar Unni wrote:
> You already see the effects of this in the Linux world, with the more
> recent distributions having to ship a set of compat_libgcc_blah packages
> for each major (ABI-incompatible) previous release going back (they're
> on 4.1/4.2 these days, and there's one for 3.3 and one f
Brian Dessent wrote:
Does this mean that we'll start to libgcc_s.dll's sprouting like
mushrooms in the install dirs of various apps, or in *gasp*
%WINDIR%/system32 over the coming years? Is this library versioned at
all? What about conflicts?
You already see the effects of this in the Linux
Charles Wilson wrote:
> > Are we really going to tell them that there is no choice in the matter,
> > that if they want cross-.so EH they must suffer shared libraries?
>
> Yes. Microsoft does the same thing. They just have an inside advantage
> in supplying their runtime with the OS.
>
> > The
Brian Dessent wrote:
Charles Wilson wrote:
C++ exceptions across DLL boundaries [*]
This also affects java. It is /NOT/ solved in 4.2, nor svn trunk. The
Official Way Forward is to get shared runtimes working...which explains
my patch-in-progress, above.
For the MinGW community for sure
Charles Wilson wrote:
> C++ exceptions across DLL boundaries [*]
> This also affects java. It is /NOT/ solved in 4.2, nor svn trunk. The
> Official Way Forward is to get shared runtimes working...which explains
> my patch-in-progress, above.
For the MinGW community for sure, and for the Cyg
Charles Wilson wrote:
> So, I thought I'd post my experiences, which ultimately resulted in a
> fully bootstrapped native cygwin compiler, with c,c++,objc,fortran,java
> frontends.
Many thanks for this, Charles.
At this point, why not to post also the resulting binaries so that Cygwin
people c
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
First, I had to massage the tree in the following ways (and I was using
revision 125636):
Out of curiosity, have you done this with cygport yet?
No: it would impose too heavy a burden on my already overloaded plate.
I'm using an alternate prefix (/opt) because I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Charles Wilson wrote:
> I was testing Danny Smith's latest DWARF-2 patch, and building gcc from
> the current (rather unsettled) trunk was a bit tricky. So, I thought
> I'd post my experiences, which ultimately resulted in a fully
> bootstrapped nat
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Charles Wilson wrote:
It'd be nice if the archiving software would Do What I Mean and Not What I
Say. It inlined all the patches. So, here's a tarball...
The patches did come through as text attachments, though... And you can
get the whole message from the archives in m
It'd be nice if the archiving software would Do What I Mean and Not What
I Say. It inlined all the patches. So, here's a tarball...
--
Chuck
gcc-4.3.0-patches.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
10 matches
Mail list logo