r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Setup.exe release-candidate
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for
> > "install from local directory", I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for
> "install from local directory", I get multiple "Can't open
> (null) for reading" errors.
I'm getting the same thing with the setup.exe downloaded from
http://cygwin.com/setup.exe tonight. At a guess, I'd say I got the
> -Original Message-
> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:50 AM
> > They would say "Something like that was planned eventually anyway -
> > thank you very much for helping".
>
> OK! - I'll put somehing together - but in that case, what i
> -Original Message-
> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:32 PM
> > At 11:00 AM 3/15/2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > >Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put
> packages
> > >in directories named for the mirror they ca
> At 11:00 AM 3/15/2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
> >Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put
packages
> >in directories named for the mirror they came from? I'm sure there was a
> >good reason, I just can't figure it out.
>
> It's to support selecting packages from multiple mi
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 12:13 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Setup.exe release-candidate
>
>
> "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
"Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Robert,
I think I've reported this too, about a month ago. I've got an old
(P133) windows98 box here, that still exhibits this problem.
That's with
%%% $Id: ChangeLog,v 2.194.2.13 2002/03/15 14:27:49 rbcollins Exp $
$Revision: 2.194.2.13
backwards compatability for future
setup.ini's.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Kiran Prakash [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Setup.exe release-candidate
Hello,
I use Win98SE, and I find setup-20020315.exe
impossible t
Hello,
I use Win98SE, and I find
setup-20020315.exeimpossible to use.
There are a couple of problems that I
noticed.first, no packages appear after the first few packages,as you
can see in both the attached bitmaps.
Also, the end of package name is
obscured.
Both occur in all three m
Robert,
Mangled URLs, somehow.
At 19:00 2002-03-15, Robert Collins wrote:
>...
>
> > o When changing to
> > "Partial View" the package title line doesn't go all the way
> > to the window border (there's a white space for a missing
> > vertical scrollbar). Solved if resizing some of the columns
> -Original Message-
> From: Hack Kampbjørn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 5:36 AM
> OK, some comments then:
Thank you.
> o It's not possible to get back to the chooser screen (if
> the window is
> hidden) by click on the task in the task-bar. Only by u
Hi!
>> Sorry, I know it's not at all helpful to say "Still flakey on 98/SE,
>> and I
>> haven't a clue how to fix it either" but if none of us said this, you
>> wouldn't know that it was still flakey on 98/SE. I won't attach
anything,
>> but screen maintenance is all shot up. Thanks for try
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Hi folk,
> the setup.exe setup200202 branch has a final pre-release
> snapshot available at
> http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots/setup-20020315.exe.
>
> IMPORTANT! This is your final chance to report release-critical bugs
> with this version. Feedback to [EMA
When using the setup-snapshot setup-20020315.exe for "install from local
directory", I get multiple "Can't open (null) for reading" errors. Setup
then aborts without going through the other packages in the queue for
installation. I found no installation messages in setup.log.full after
the abort
At 11:00 AM 3/15/2002, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put packages
>in directories named for the mirror they came from? I'm sure there was a
>good reason, I just can't figure it out.
It's to support selecting packages from multiple mirrors. Se
Hi - Could someone tell me what the reason behind making setup put packages
in directories named for the mirror they came from? I'm sure there was a
good reason, I just can't figure it out.
Thanks,
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: ht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry, I know it's not at all helpful to say "Still flakey on 98/SE, and I
> haven't a clue how to fix it either" but if none of us said this, you
> wouldn't know that it was still flakey on 98/SE. I won't attach anything,
> but screen maintenance is all shot up. Thanks
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:54 AM
> If those of
> us who need to keep a local copy of the current setup.exe
> v.2.125.2.10, is there any reason why it shouldn't work with
> future setup.ini's, even afte
Sorry, I know it's not at all helpful to say "Still flakey on 98/SE, and I
haven't a clue how to fix it either" but if none of us said this, you
wouldn't know that it was still flakey on 98/SE. I won't attach anything,
but screen maintenance is all shot up. Thanks for trying so hard to get this
ri
19 matches
Mail list logo
