On 10/24/2010 2:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'll fix it though.
The problem should be fixed in the snapshot that is currently being
built.
Confirmed. Thanks.
Ken
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.h
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 12:40:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I'll fix it though.
The problem should be fixed in the snapshot that is currently being
built. It will show up at cygwin.com soon.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cyg
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:51:38PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>On 10/20/2010 4:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:25:37PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>> On 20 October 2010 13:20, Andy Koppe wrote:
> Corinna made tcgetpgrp return 0 instead of -1 in some circumstances
>
On 24 October 2010 03:51, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 4:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I think I'm seeing some pattern to the way Linux handles [tcgetpgrp] and I
>> should be able to make Cygwin work the same way.
>
> This seems to be fixed in the latest snapshot, as far as emacs is conce
On 10/20/2010 4:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:25:37PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 20 October 2010 13:20, Andy Koppe wrote:
Corinna made tcgetpgrp return 0 instead of -1 in some circumstances
(see http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2009-q4/msg00045.html)
becaus
On 10/20/2010 4:32 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:25:37PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 20 October 2010 13:20, Andy Koppe wrote:
Corinna made tcgetpgrp return 0 instead of -1 in some circumstances
(see http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2009-q4/msg00045.html)
becaus
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:25:37PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>On 20 October 2010 13:20, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>>Corinna made tcgetpgrp return 0 instead of -1 in some circumstances
>>>(see http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2009-q4/msg00045.html)
>>>because she saw Linux doing that. ??But when I r
On 20 October 2010 13:20, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> Corinna made tcgetpgrp return 0 instead of -1 in some circumstances (see
>> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2009-q4/msg00045.html) because she
>> saw Linux doing that. But when I run Corinna's test on my Linux system, I
>> get -1 where she got
On 20 October 2010 12:21, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 1:09 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>> Emacs creates a subprocess that runs an interactive bash shell. Emacs
>>> wants
>>> to get the PGID of the foreground process group associated to the tty of
>>> this shell, and it does this on Linux via TIOCG
On 10/20/2010 1:09 AM, Andy Koppe wrote:
On 20 October 2010 04:17, Ken Brown wrote:
Emacs creates a subprocess that runs an interactive bash shell. Emacs wants
to get the PGID of the foreground process group associated to the tty of
this shell, and it does this on Linux via TIOCGPGRP (or equal
On 20 October 2010 04:17, Ken Brown wrote:
> Emacs creates a subprocess that runs an interactive bash shell. Emacs wants
> to get the PGID of the foreground process group associated to the tty of
> this shell, and it does this on Linux via TIOCGPGRP (or equally well
> tcgetpgrp). I think it uses
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:17:39PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>On 10/19/2010 10:15 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I would like to create a STC that would let me investigate this further,
>but I don't know enough programming to do it. It ought to be completely
>trivial. Here's what happens:
>
>Emacs
On 10/19/2010 10:15 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:32:34AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/18/2010 4:18 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:40:21PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/18/2010 2:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 09:32:34AM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>On 10/18/2010 4:18 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:40:21PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> On 10/18/2010 2:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10
On 10/18/2010 4:18 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:40:21PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/18/2010 2:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longst
On 10/18/2010 4:18 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:40:21PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/18/2010 2:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longst
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 03:40:21PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>On 10/18/2010 2:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>>> On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
ema
On 10/18/2010 2:34 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses. A
symptom
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>> I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
>> emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses. A
>> symptom from the user's point of view is that one c
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 06:40:19PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>On 18 October 2010 18:27, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 10/18/2010 10:58 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>
> I could use s
On 18 October 2010 18:27, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 10:58 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs
On 10/18/2010 10:58 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses. A
symptom
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:06:56PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote:
>On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>> I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
>> emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses. A
>> symptom from the user's point of view is that one c
On 10/18/2010 9:12 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
On 18.10.2010 15:36, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/18/2010 4:46 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
On 16.10.2010 20:17, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to
On 18.10.2010 15:36, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/18/2010 4:46 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
On 16.10.2010 20:17, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses.
This off top but I use native Ema
On 10/18/2010 4:46 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote:
On 16.10.2010 20:17, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses.
This off top but I use native Emacs and have annoying bug:
in C-x shell
On 16.10.2010 20:17, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses.
This off top but I use native Emacs and have annoying bug:
in C-x shell if I start cygwin app it can not be broken by C-
On 10/16/2010 1:17 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
I could use some help fixing a longstanding bug in the Cygwin build of
emacs, in which emacs is unable to send signals to subprocesses. A
symptom from the user's point of view is that one cannot interrupt a
process in shell mode by typing C-c C-c. I've fo
28 matches
Mail list logo
