Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread Chloe
> I am not sure that it is a cygwin specific problem. Unfortunately I know > nothing of ruby so debugging is a bit hard > Marco It works using RailsInstaller.org, so that leads me to believe it is Cygwin. I just started Ruby, so I don't know how to debug either. > As you open a ticket with the b

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread marco atzeri
On 1/30/2013 2:55 AM, Chloe wrote: Steps to reproduce, test case: setup.exe # Install Ruby gem install rails rails new testapp # error rails -v cd testapp rails -v # error I was able to replicate, but I am not sure that it is a cygwin specific problem. Unfortunately I know nothing of ruby so

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread Chloe
Steps to reproduce, test case: setup.exe # Install Ruby gem install rails rails new testapp # error rails -v cd testapp rails -v # error -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Uns

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread marco atzeri
On 1/29/2013 6:44 PM, Chloe wrote: how we can replicate your problem, if you do not provide us all the step you did ? Regards Marco Please see the 3 emails sent last night. Point 0: your mail program seems broken, anytime you reply there is no link on the previous thread; instead you are sta

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread Chloe
> how we can replicate your problem, if you do not provide us > all the step you did ? > Regards > Marco Please see the 3 emails sent last night. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.h

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread marco atzeri
On 1/29/2013 5:52 PM, Chloe wrote: References: <71851B8A7D9A48F48D1311D1326528AC@dumbopc> rails is not part of cygwin http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=rails> and clarifying from where your "rails" is coming from ? rails is like a Perl CPAN package, like CGI::Simple, but for R

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread Chloe
References: <71851B8A7D9A48F48D1311D1326528AC@dumbopc> > rails is not part of cygwin > http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=rails> and clarifying > from where your "rails" is coming from ? rails is like a Perl CPAN package, like CGI::Simple, but for Ruby. I believe ruby the executa

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-29 Thread marco atzeri
On 1/29/2013 5:11 AM, Chloe wrote: How do I report a problem to the person who maintains the Ruby package for Cygwin? How do I find who that is? this is the right place. Do NOT send direct e-mail to the maintainer $ ruby --version ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10 revision 37606) [i386-cygwin] Chl

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-28 Thread Chloe
I may have found something. I added -d to the rails script and it printed this: Chloe@dumbopc /cygdrive/c/Sites/railsinstaller_demo $ rails -v Exception `LoadError' at /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/rubygems.rb:1264 - cannot load such file -- rubygems/defaults/operating_system Exception `LoadErro

Re: Ruby: stack level too deep (SystemStackError)

2013-01-28 Thread Chloe
I see the Ruby packager is here a.. From: Yaakov (Cygwin/X) b.. Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: ruby-1.9.3-p374-1 Additional info: I tried both versions of Ruby, ruby 1.9.3p327 and ruby-1.9.3-p374-1. I found something from Google that hinted that 1.9.2 might fix the problem, but I could