RE: Reply request

2022-11-14 Thread Electa Kovacek
Hi, Any updates regarding my previous email? If this is not relevant to you, please share me your requirement. Always happy to hear from you! Regards, Electa Subject: Hospital Procurement Managers Email Leads. Hi, I'm curious to know if you'd be interested in acquiring verified Cont

Re: reply: problem with nc 1.107-4

2017-03-30 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2017-03-30 10:44, Michael Enright wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:28 PM, 高锋 wrote: >> Two days ago, I wanted to determine whether a udp port of another >> machine is open or not, which is deployed on different subnet. But >> Windows platform does not provide utility that can do this. So I >

Re: reply: problem with nc 1.107-4

2017-03-30 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, 高锋! Please don' top-post. Thank you. > Two days ago,i wanted to determine whether a udp port of another machine is > open or not, which is deployed on different subnet. > But windows platform does not provide utility that can dose this.So i > downloaded a setup.exe from cygwin,of which

Re: reply: problem with nc 1.107-4

2017-03-30 Thread Michael Enright
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:28 PM, 高锋 wrote: > Two days ago,i wanted to determine whether a udp port of another machine is > open or not, which is deployed on different subnet. > But windows platform does not provide utility that can dose this.So i > downloaded a setup.exe from cygwin,of which ver

Re: Reply

2008-07-28 Thread r
On 2008-07-28, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > r wrote on 28 July 2008 08:21: > >> Unlike linux, cygwin does not warn me about new mail messages >> in inbox. > >> but in cygwin, there is no "write" command. > > And bizarrely we have "wall" but no "walld". > >> Is there something like it o

Re: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

2003-06-04 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 03:54:30PM -0700, Biju G C wrote: >--- Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to >>the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its >>administrator. > >Then how is it happening in cygwin-xfree

Re: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

2003-06-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
At 15:54 2003-06-03, Biju G C wrote: --- Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to > the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator. > > Randall Schulz Then how is it happening in cygwin-xfree

Re: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

2003-06-04 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> Then how is it happening in cygwin-xfree list? > No were in my mail system I have mentioned "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > And I use same mail-id with same settings > to access both "cygwin" and "cygwin-xfree" > > But they do it differently !!! > [...] Yup. It's been thrashed out here, adding 'Reply-to'

Re: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

2003-06-04 Thread Scott W Brim
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 02:13:05PM -0700, Randall R Schulz allegedly wrote: > Hi, > > The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to > the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator. > > Randall Schulz Reply-To is often added by list servers, but I v

Re: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

2003-06-04 Thread Biju G C
--- Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to > the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator. > > Randall Schulz Then how is it happening in cygwin-xfree list? No were in my mail system

Re: Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com

2003-06-04 Thread Randall R Schulz
Hi, The Reply-To: header (or, more precisely, control over it) belongs to the originator of the mail, not to the list server or its administrator. Randall Schulz At 13:40 2003-06-03, Biju G C wrote: cgf, When I reply to any mail from cygwin list it is going to the actual sender instead of [EMA