On Sun, 03 Mar 2013 06:15:48 -0500, Chloe wrote:
> > So where are these gems coming from and how many are there? Too
> > many/ones from unknown places are going to be either missed
> > by 'rubyrebase' or be impossible to fit in memory without
> > collision with other installed DLLs. See this thre
On 3/3/2013 3:05 PM, Chloe wrote:
/usr/bin/ruby.exe: skipped because not rebaseable
If any existing process has the file open, you would see this.
There might be other causes as well.
Unfortunately I must forgo Cygwin for native Windows executables.
While rebase problems can indeed be a bi
If they are "standard" fpr you, Cygwin may not know about them. You have to
manually supply a list of shared libs and applications your project depends
upon to rebase them on the same ground with the rest of Cygwin.
FYI, I saw these lines in the output. I don't know if they are relevant.
Notice
Greetings, Chloe!
>> So where are these gems coming from and how many are there? Too
>> many/ones from unknown places are going to be either missed
>> by 'rubyrebase' or be impossible to fit in memory without
>> collision with other installed DLLs. See this thread for more
>> discussion of this:
So where are these gems coming from and how many are there? Too
many/ones from unknown places are going to be either missed
by 'rubyrebase' or be impossible to fit in memory without
collision with other installed DLLs. See this thread for more
discussion of this:
They come from 'bundle install
On 2/25/2013 12:17 AM, Chloe wrote:
I'm trying to run 'rails console' in an app with many, many gems (not a test
app) and it is giving me these errors. I've already tried to run 'rebaseall'
with ash and I also ran 'rubyrebase' using a script I found on this list
archive. Neither helped. I've trie
6 matches
Mail list logo
