Re: Problem with fork() in latest snapshot

2010-12-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:38:42AM -0600, Heath Kehoe wrote: >On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I ran the test case in a loop on my Windows XP system under various >>conditions - no load, load, no load with most services stopped. I >>couldn't reproduce the problem. >> >>I als

Re: Problem with fork() in latest snapshot

2010-12-12 Thread Heath Kehoe
On Dec 7, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I ran the test case in a loop on my Windows XP system under various > conditions - > no load, load, no load with most services stopped. I couldn't reproduce the > problem. > > I also tried on a virtual system running Windows 7 64-bit and

Re: Problem with fork() in latest snapshot

2010-12-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:41:41PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Nov 10 13:43, Heath Kehoe wrote: >> I have ruby 1.9.2 which I built from source. It works fine in cygwin >> 1.7.7 and earlier, but in the current snapshot when it does a fork, >> the child process dies pretty much instantly. >>

Re: Problem with fork() in latest snapshot

2010-11-22 Thread Heath Kehoe
On Nov 16, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 10 13:43, Heath Kehoe wrote: >> I have ruby 1.9.2 which I built from source. It works fine in cygwin >> 1.7.7 and earlier, but in the current snapshot when it does a fork, >> the child process dies pretty much instantly. >> >> I've pu

Re: Problem with fork() in latest snapshot

2010-11-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 10 13:43, Heath Kehoe wrote: > I have ruby 1.9.2 which I built from source. It works fine in cygwin > 1.7.7 and earlier, but in the current snapshot when it does a fork, > the child process dies pretty much instantly. > > I've put together a test case (see attached) which replicates what >