Re: Problem in calling _stat() on Cygwin 1.7

2010-02-27 Thread Dave Korn
On 27/02/2010 15:14, Dave Lee wrote: >> If it (meddling with internal affairs, such as using _stat) hurts too >> much, then don't do it (use stat instead, it's standardized). > > An off-topic question: on system where both XXX() and _XXX() are available > (where XXX = open, read, write, access, ch

Re: Problem in calling _stat() on Cygwin 1.7

2010-02-27 Thread Dave Lee
> If it (meddling with internal affairs, such as using _stat) > hurts too much, then don't do it (use stat instead, it's > standardized). An off-topic question: on system where both XXX() and _XXX() are available (where XXX = open, read, write, access, chmod, ... etc), can one assume what _XXX()

Re: Problem in calling _stat() on Cygwin 1.7

2010-02-27 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 27.02.2010, 12:57 Uhr, schrieb Dave Lee : Is it a problem with _stat(), or did I make a mistake in the 2nd argument in calling _stat()? If it (meddling with internal affairs, such as using _stat) hurts too much, then don't do it (use stat instead, it's standardized). -- Matthias Andree