Phil Smith wrote:
exactly what part of "(obviously I can figure this out, but if I knew
offhand it would save me some hassle)" was unclear?
He's saying try it and find out:
$ cat > foo.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo $#
^D
$ chmod +x foo.sh
$ ./foo.sh -Dsomething=c:/Documents and Settings/whatever
3
$ ./foo
D] On Behalf Of Christopher
Faylor
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 6:32 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Probably stupid make question
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 01:35:11PM -0700, Phil Smith wrote:
>Will shell scripts get
>
> -Dsomething=c:/Documents and Settings/whatever
>
>as on
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 01:35:11PM -0700, Phil Smith wrote:
>Will shell scripts get
>
> -Dsomething=c:/Documents and Settings/whatever
>
>as one argument, or three?
If only there was some way to tell...
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Phil Smith on 8/30/2008 3:06 PM:
> But you've (seemingly inadvertently?) answered the question,
Nope, my reply was not inadvertent (I mentioned quoting on purpose).
>
> P.S. And no, I'm not going to get into a top-posting vs. inline di
Phil wrote:
" Will shell scripts get
"
" -Dsomething=c:/Documents and Settings/whatever
"
" as one argument, or three?
As I hinted in my (off-topic, sorry) other post, you can figure this out for
yourself with trivial scripts in the language of interest. But also, you can
note the recurring th
that works. Thanks!
...phsiii
P.S. And no, I'm not going to get into a top-posting vs. inline discussion --
that boat has sailed. I did remove your email address below, however,
including the raw copy in your sig...
-Original Message-
From: Eric Blake
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin.com
Oops - raw email address. http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR
Oops - top-posting. http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
> This is all an argument for using Cy
stupid make question
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:00:14AM -0700, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
>Yes, it's awful, but the batch file isn't totally at a loss. If, in
>the batch file, you refer to parameters %1 %2 etc., as you've
>discovered, the parsing treats equals signs (and semi
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:34:36AM -0700, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>Creating a test batch file that echos %1 etc and %* is pretty trivial
>to create. In mine, I tend to do
>@echo echoing percent-n
>@echo .%1. .%2. .%3. .%4. .%5. .%6. .%7. .%8. .%9.
>and similarly for %* -- the dots w
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:00:14AM -0700, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>
>Yes, it's awful, but the batch file isn't totally at a loss. If, in
>the batch file, you refer to parameters %1 %2 etc., as you've
>discovered, the parsing treats equals signs (and semicolons, and
>perhaps others; I forget) as spa
--Original Message-
From: Stephan Mueller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 1:35 PM
To: Phil Smith; Jay; cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: Probably stupid make question (cmd a=b)
Creating a test batch file that echos %1 etc and %* is pretty trivial to
create. In mine, I
no-space-in-name location.
stephan();
-Original Message-
From: Phil Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 8:57 AM
To: Jay; cygwin@cygwin.com; Stephan Mueller
Subject: RE: Probably stupid make question (cmd a=b)
Thanks for the good ideas.
The Makefile is generated by CMake, and
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jay
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 10:48 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com; Phil Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Probably stupid make question (cmd a=b)
continuing somewhat off topic:
> Probably stupid make question
> 14
continuing somewhat off topic:
> Probably stupid make question
> 144097 by: Phil
> 144106 by: Stephan
> But really, just about anything is better than cmd.
Have you tried quotes?
D:\>type 2.cmd
@echo 1 is %1
@echo 2 is %2
2:36 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: RE: Probably stupid make question
Well, this is just ducky. I'm posting this so it goes in the archives and maybe
saves someone else a LOT of heartache.
Batch files treat incoming, unquoted equals signs as spaces!
For the cross-compiling I
k and kill whoever
implemented THAT (I know, get in line...)!
...phsiii
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher
Faylor
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 4:33 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Probably stupid make question
On Thu, Aug 28,
sday, August 28, 2008 4:14 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Probably stupid make question
Phil Smith wrote:
> We're perverting CMake and Cygwin make to use a cross-compiler for z/OS (IBM
> mainframe). We've beaten it mostly into submission, but are hitting an issue
> with
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 01:13:47PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Phil Smith wrote:
>>We're perverting CMake and Cygwin make to use a cross-compiler for z/OS
>>(IBM mainframe). We've beaten it mostly into submission, but are
>>hitting an issue with definitions being passed. Cygwin make seems to
>>b
Phil Smith wrote:
> We're perverting CMake and Cygwin make to use a cross-compiler for z/OS (IBM
> mainframe). We've beaten it mostly into submission, but are hitting an issue
> with definitions being passed. Cygwin make seems to be passing them in the
> format:
> -Dvarname value
> rat
19 matches
Mail list logo
