On Jul 20 12:28, Bruce Dobrin wrote:
> This seems to indicate what is going on (I'd suspected something like
> this) and had noticed that the addition of waitpid (or wait) did solve
> this problem in the test case. Unfortunately, for me, the way I'm
> using fork is to spawn 5 to 10 concurrent rs
Christopher Faylor skrev:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Jul 18 17:45, Bruce Dobrin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I stripped down the code to a small testable bit. The problem seems to
>>> occur when I reach 256 forks on a cygwin1.5.18 or 19 but not on my
>>> cygwin
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jul 18 17:45, Bruce Dobrin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I stripped down the code to a small testable bit. The problem seems to
>> occur when I reach 256 forks on a cygwin1.5.18 or 19 but not on my
>> cygwin1.5.5. win2k system. The origin
s
list of active children?
Thanks
Bruce
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Corinna Vinschen
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 12:26 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Perl failure
On Jul 19 16:30, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > Thanks f
On Jul 19 16:30, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> > Thanks for the suggestion, I tried it with 1.5.20 and 1.5.21s 20060718.
> > But Alas no better luck. Any Idea if this is Cygwin or Perl?
>
> I'm betting on cygwin. I hope to look more into this soon.
Did anybody of you bother to read my repl
> Thanks for the suggestion, I tried it with 1.5.20 and 1.5.21s 20060718.
> But Alas no better luck. Any Idea if this is Cygwin or Perl?
I'm betting on cygwin. I hope to look more into this soon.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://
Thanks for the suggestion, I tried it with 1.5.20 and 1.5.21s 20060718.
But Alas no better luck. Any Idea if this is Cygwin or Perl?
Thanks
Bruce D.
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)"
To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:15:14 -0400
Subject: Re: Perl failure
Reference
On Jul 18 17:45, Bruce Dobrin wrote:
> Hi,
> I stripped down the code to a small testable bit. The problem seems to
> occur when I reach 256 forks on a cygwin1.5.18 or 19 but not on my
> cygwin1.5.5. win2k system. The original code give the forked process
> time to finish, but it still looks l
Bruce Dobrin wrote:
Hi,
I stripped down the code to a small testable bit. The problem seems to
occur when I reach 256 forks on a cygwin1.5.18 or 19 but not on my
cygwin1.5.5. win2k system. The original code give the forked process
time to finish, but it still looks like it eats it after abou
ing around for some other machines
with older cygwins on them to establish what version it stopped working
in.
Thanks for your time
Bruce D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 11:06 AM
To
runs great until it craps out after 1.5 hours.
I hope the above helps
Thanks
Bruce D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:53 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Perl failure
On Wed, Jul 12
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 08:53:09AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:08:43PM -0700, Bruce Dobrin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a server that has been doing back end maintenance using perl on
> > cygwin for 6 years now. I recently upgraded from win2k and cyg1.5.9 t
On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 05:08:43PM -0700, Bruce Dobrin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a server that has been doing back end maintenance using perl on
> cygwin for 6 years now. I recently upgraded from win2k and cyg1.5.9 to
> XP sp3 and cyg1.5.19 (to be fare, I also cleaned up the perl code a
> bit). T
13 matches
Mail list logo
