Re: Newlib/Cygwin now under GIT

2015-03-12 Thread DJ Delorie
> This is a common problem. I guess newlib/cygwin got the oldest set > and, afaik, the GCC toplevel stuff is kind of the master. It would > be nice if we had some automatism in place to keep all former src > repos in sync. There was never any agreement on who the "master" was for toplevel sourc

Re: Newlib/Cygwin now under GIT

2015-03-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
[Somehow I managed to drop newlib from the recipient list. Re-added] On Mar 10 19:19, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mar 10 17:03, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > Hi fellow developers, > > > > > > > > > I'm happy to inform you that the move of Newli

Re: Newlib/Cygwin now under GIT

2015-03-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 10 17:03, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Hi fellow developers, > > > > > > I'm happy to inform you that the move of Newlib/Cygwin from the src CVS > > repository to the new, combined GIT repository is now final. > > I note that this repository in

Re: Newlib/Cygwin now under GIT

2015-03-10 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi fellow developers, > > > I'm happy to inform you that the move of Newlib/Cygwin from the src CVS > repository to the new, combined GIT repository is now final. I note that this repository includes the include/ directory, in its larger binutils-