during remote acess. There has
> been some insight on what the problem seems to be in regards to the
> version of Cygwin. My question is regards to a immediate work-around
> this permissions issue with inetd/xinetd ?
>
> Thanks everyone for taking the time in looking into this issue.
>
Cygwin. My question is
regards to
a immediate work-around this permissions issue with inetd/xinetd ?
Thanks everyone for taking the time in looking into this issue.
Steve
Fwd: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet]
From: Larry Hall
To: Cygwin
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2003 23:33:51 -0400
Subject
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
> Bruce,
> This is starting to become clear o what is actually going on.
> How do you currently get around this issue ?
>
> Steve
Steve,
Please either quote the message you're replying to, or make sure your
mailer contains threading informatio
Original Message
Bruce Dobrin wrote:
YIKES! There it is, and right there in the users guide no less
not only that, but in a section I've actually read a number of
times!. Well, that does explain almost everything that is going on
( though, it seems to have
t; > drwxrwxrwx+ 1 Administ Domain A0 Feb 27 20:55 3dmaxupdate
> > drwxrwxrwx+ 1 Administ Domain A0 Mar 26 11:08 ACDSee
> > .
> > /c/WINNT/system32/dfscmd.exe /view dfsmaster\\dfsshare > poop
> > cat poop
> > \\DFSMASTER\dfsroot
> &
gt; \\DFSMASTER\dfsroot\pipe\usr_pasquini\trash
> The command completed successfully.
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Banville, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Se
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 8:04 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> I tried executing a the command vi
hen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> hmmm, still experimenting: thought it might have something to do with
> inetd and mounts, but I also tried rlogin to which is
running
>
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Steve,
On Windows, if you use the Windows sharing mechanism (instead of a
proprietary filesystem driver), your shares are SMB shares (which stands
for Server Message Block, IIRC). The 'smbntsec' option is designed for
those kinds of shares.
Methinks the documentation w
27;Bruce Dobrin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Banville, Stephen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 5:32 AM
Subject: RE: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Igor,
> I tried settting smbntsec and it did not work. With older version I
> used to
> just
--Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 7:30 PM
To: Stephen Banville
Cc: 'Bruce Dobrin'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: NTsec permissions issue over inet
Steve,
On Windows, if you use the Windows sharing mec
ne, the one it worked on is actually a 1.3.12 machine. so,
> with 1.3.12 I can get it to work by forcing a password entry, but this
> appears not to work with a 1.3.22 machine
> continuing more confused than ever...
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bruce Dobri
brin
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
OK, further testing, I can't get the below rlogin "trick" to work on a
1.3.22 machine, the one it worked on is actually a 1.3.12 machine. so,
with 1.3.12 I can get it to wor
e confused than ever...
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Sorry, On re-reading that, it's not as clear as it could b
CTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Thanks for responding Larry,
>
> I actually had tried most permutations of (no)ntsec, (no)smbntsec,
(no)ntea,
> etc... and on other m
Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> Bruce Dobrin wrote:
> > Here are
Dobrin
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Dobrin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Banville, Stephen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: NTsec permiss
Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 9:52 AM
To: Banville, Stephen
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
Banville, Stephen wrote:
> My system that I have Cygwin running on is a Windows 2000 platform. I h
t: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:26 PM
To: Banville, Stephen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm not sure if this issue has been detected. I have traversed
> through the MANY probelm
ECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Banville, Stephen
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
Stephen,
I was about to ask the same question
If you find a solution, PLEASE Post, as I'm running out of workarounds, I
have had no luck with nosmbntsec/smbnt
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
For the future, please *attach* the cygcheck output to avoid generating
false positives on message archive search.
Random idea: would it be possible to instruct ezmlm-idx to bounce
messages containing cygcheck output in the body? (Or enough text to
identify cygcheck
ECTED]>
To: "Banville, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: NTsec permissions issue over inet
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I'm not sure if this
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Banville, Stephen wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'm not sure if this issue has been detected. I have traversed
> through the MANY probelm reports
> and haven't been able to find any specifics on this problem.
>
> The problem:
>
> My system that I have Cygwin running on is a Wind
23 matches
Mail list logo
