On 02/13/2016 05:41 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote:
>
> Yes, I have, two of them fail entirely to start, and the third starts,
> but crashes quickly. As each also has its own hardware drivers, I
> suspect it would be harder getting it to work in Wine than writing
> fresh. They are currenty in VMware
n
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Tony Kelman wrote:
> Erik Soderquist writes:
>
>> currently I'm studying programming myself now with a direct goal of
>> being able to write a Linux compatible replacement so I can dump my
>> own amber-coated XP
>
> Have you tried running the Windows binaries un
Erik Soderquist gmail.com> writes:
> currently I'm studying programming myself now with a direct goal of
> being able to write a Linux compatible replacement so I can dump my
> own amber-coated XP
Have you tried running the Windows binaries under Wine? It's worth a
shot. Wine has some hefty depe
On Feb 12 16:58, Erik Soderquist wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> > The last time this topic came up, I came away with the impression that the
> > only reason Cygwin hasn’t jettisoned XP support yet is that it’s more work
> > than ignoring that old code.
>
> I have
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>>
>>> I hope not. Extended support ended nearly two years ago.
>>
>> ...why waste the resources on newer (and more bloated) pack
On Feb 12, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> I hope not. Extended support ended nearly two years ago.
>
> ...why waste the resources on newer (and more bloated) packages?
The same blade cuts both ways. The small and shrinki
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> I hope not. Extended support ended nearly two years ago. That’s 22 months
> of unfixed security problems, bugs, and regressions with respect to the state
> of the world. (By the latter, I mean things like outdated time zone rules.)
When
On Feb 11, 2016, at 11:10 AM, cyg Simple wrote:
>
> A git tag would be helpful for LAST-XP supported version.
Easy to do, but I wonder how many people would use it? I doubt there’s a lot
of overlap between the group of people unwilling to upgrade their XP boxes and
the group willing to instal
On 2/10/2016 12:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-02-10 11:13, LMH wrote:
>> Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>> On 2016-02-09 19:37, Jonathan Brenster wrote:
I saw a post a number of months back indicating that XP support would
start to phase out in Dec '15.
Is there a last vers
On 2016-02-10 11:13, LMH wrote:
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2016-02-09 19:37, Jonathan Brenster wrote:
I saw a post a number of months back indicating that XP support would
start to phase out in Dec '15.
Is there a last version or intended last version that still officially
supports it?
Suppo
Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2016-02-09 19:37, Jonathan Brenster wrote:
>> I saw a post a number of months back indicating that XP support would
>> start to phase out in Dec '15.
>>
>> Is there a last version or intended last version that still officially
>> supports it?
>
> Support for XP has yet
Greetings, Jonathan Brenster!
> I saw a post a number of months back indicating that XP support would
> start to phase out in Dec '15.
> Is there a last version or intended last version that still officially
> supports it?
> I understand XP is well past EOL, just looking for the info.
There was
On 2016-02-09 19:37, Jonathan Brenster wrote:
I saw a post a number of months back indicating that XP support would
start to phase out in Dec '15.
Is there a last version or intended last version that still officially
supports it?
Support for XP has yet to be removed but that is subject to cha
13 matches
Mail list logo
