On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:55:37AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:13:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Tonight's snapshot is nearly 1.5.3-ready.
>>
>>I'd appreciate it if people would test the snapshot and report failures
>>or successes here.
>
>Using this snapshot
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 02:17:49PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>History: Up to now, and for months past, running everything [curr] on W98/SE
>has been completely bomb-proof apart from occasional problems when running
>XWin and after exiting XWin. (Problems= blue screen; copies of rxvt, bash
>an
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:13:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Tonight's snapshot is nearly 1.5.3-ready.
I'd appreciate it if people would test the snapshot and report failures
or successes here.
Using this snapshot, sshd still eats up all CPU time when running a
re
History: Up to now, and for months past, running everything [curr] on W98/SE
has been completely bomb-proof apart from occasional problems when running
XWin and after exiting XWin. (Problems= blue screen; copies of rxvt, bash
and winoldap left lying around; wget almost always grinding to a halt whe
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:17:40AM -0400, Russell O'Connor wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen writes:
> > It's a border case. I don't know if it's worth to wait for the fix.
> > It would be nice if I could reproduce it under a debugger :-(
>
> If you are referring to "malloc returns overlapping buffers",
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>
> > Btw, I know that Corinna has at least one mmap patch to add before this
> > goes gold.
>
> It's a border case. I don't know if it's worth to wait for the fix.
> It would be nice if I could reproduce it under a debugger :-(
>
If you are referring to "malloc return
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:56:20PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 03:25:54AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Tonight's snapshot is nearly 1.5.3-ready.
> >>
> >>I'd appreciate it if people would test the snapshot and repo
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:13:21PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Tonight's snapshot is nearly 1.5.3-ready.
>
> I'd appreciate it if people would test the snapshot and report failures
> or successes here.
Using this snapshot, sshd still eats up all CPU time when running a
remote session.
> B
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 03:25:54AM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Tonight's snapshot is nearly 1.5.3-ready.
>>
>>I'd appreciate it if people would test the snapshot and report failures
>>or successes here.
>>
>>If there are no serious issues with this
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tonight's snapshot is nearly 1.5.3-ready.
>
> I'd appreciate it if people would test the snapshot and report failures
> or successes here.
>
> If there are no serious issues with this version then I will probably
> flip the switch and make 1.5.3 the
10 matches
Mail list logo