On 9/27/2015 5:54 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Walter L.!
My question was merely based on Andrey's statement that "This is
configurable" (see above); I don't know what he meant and what "this" is,
Git or Cygwin.
"This" being "Git", and http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-09/msg00072.html
Greetings, Walter L.!
> My question was merely based on Andrey's statement that "This is
> configurable" (see above); I don't know what he meant and what "this" is,
> Git or Cygwin.
"This" being "Git", and http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-09/msg00072.html
> If by saying "This is configurable" he
On 9/26/2015 6:10 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 9/26/2015 5:05 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>
> > Greetings, Walter L.!
> >
> > > This is very unfortunate because I'm using Git in Cygwin
> > > specifically because it doesn't set the executable bit like Windows
> > > applications.
> >
> > This is, you kno
On 9/26/2015 4:26 PM, Walter L. wrote:
On 9/26/2015 5:05 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Walter L.!
> This is very unfortunate because I'm using Git in Cygwin specifically
> because it doesn't set the executable bit like Windows applications.
This is, you know, configurable?...
Which par
On 9/26/2015 5:05 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Walter L.!
> This is very unfortunate because I'm using Git in Cygwin specifically
> because it doesn't set the executable bit like Windows applications.
This is, you know, configurable?...
Which part? Git or Cygwin? You mean I can configr
Greetings, Walter L.!
> This is very unfortunate because I'm using Git in Cygwin specifically
> because it doesn't set the executable bit like Windows applications.
This is, you know, configurable?...
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Saturday, September 26, 2015 12:04:24
Sorry for my terrib
On 9/25/2015 2:24 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
Why not just run 'setfacl -b' once and for all on whatever directory you
do your work in? Is it under your home directory? Do you have default
ACL entries on your home directory that are then inherited by every
subdirectory you create?
Ken
Actually yes
On 9/25/2015 2:01 PM, Walter L. wrote:
On 9/25/2015 12:04 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> I think you misunderstood what Marco was saying. If the problem is
> caused by the default ACL on the directory, you could fix that ACL.
To elaborate on this, observe the following:
Hi Ken, thanks for the clari
On 9/25/2015 12:04 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> I think you misunderstood what Marco was saying. If the problem is
> caused by the default ACL on the directory, you could fix that ACL.
To elaborate on this, observe the following:
Hi Ken, thanks for the clarification. I understood what Marco meant
On 9/25/2015 11:23 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
I think you misunderstood what Marco was saying. If the problem is
caused by the default ACL on the directory, you could fix that ACL.
To elaborate on this, observe the following:
$ cd /cygdrive/c/Users/kbrown/AppData/Local/Temp
$ getfacl .
# file: .
#
On 9/25/2015 11:01 AM, Walter L. wrote:
On 24/09/2015 07:35, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> 2) The 'touch' command creates a file with the executable bit set
>
> [user@hostname ~]$ touch newfile.txt
> [user@hostname ~]$ ls -l newfile.txt
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 user Domain Users 0 Sep 22 17:21 newfile.txt
It l
On 24/09/2015 07:35, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> 2) The 'touch' command creates a file with the executable bit set
>
> [user@hostname ~]$ touch newfile.txt
> [user@hostname ~]$ ls -l newfile.txt
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 user Domain Users 0 Sep 22 17:21 newfile.txt
It likely depends on the inherited permission
Greetings, Linda Walsh!
>>> > > > > I believe the target of the symlink should be "protocol" (i.e.
>>> How would that affect 'services'?
>>
>> Sorry, you lost me. 'services' has 8 characters in the file name and so is
>> its symlink target; That shouldn't be an issue. Of the 4 symlinks under
>>
Walter L. wrote:
> > > > I believe the target of the symlink should be "protocol" (i.e.
How would that affect 'services'?
Sorry, you lost me. 'services' has 8 characters in the file name and so is
its symlink target; That shouldn't be an issue. Of the 4 symlinks under
/etc/ (i.e. networks, h
> > > > I believe the target of the symlink should be "protocol" (i.e.
> > > > singular)
> > >
> > > Err. That is. How did no one found it earlier?
> > ---
> > Because it is plural on unix/linux? MS seems to have misspelt it?
>
> I believe it's "misspelt" due to the 8 character limit for lega
Greetings, Linda Walsh!
>>> > > I believe the target of the symlink should be "protocol" (i.e.
>>> > > singular)
>>> >
>>> > Err. That is. How did no one found it earlier?
>>> ---
>>> Because it is plural on unix/linux? MS seems to have misspelt it?
>>
>> I believe it's "misspelt" due to the
On 23/09/2015 01:04, Walter L. wrote:
Hi,
I've just performed a fresh install of the latest (2.2.1) Cygwin on 64-bit
Windows 7 and noticed 2 issues with the new version that I'd like to verify
whether or not they are bugs:
2) The 'touch' command creates a file with the executable bit set
[u
Walter L. wrote:
> > I believe the target of the symlink should be "protocol" (i.e.
> > singular)
>
> Err. That is. How did no one found it earlier?
---
Because it is plural on unix/linux? MS seems to have misspelt it?
I believe it's "misspelt" due to the 8 character limit for legacy file
> > I believe the target of the symlink should be "protocol" (i.e.
> > singular)
>
> Err. That is. How did no one found it earlier?
---
Because it is plural on unix/linux? MS seems to have misspelt it?
I believe it's "misspelt" due to the 8 character limit for legacy file
names, and the wei
Walter L. wrote:
Define "earlier" ? The permissions handling has been extensively
rewritten
since 1.7.34.
Probably from a few months ago, but I can't confirm. I've been trying to
figure out how to revert back to an earlier version to verify this. Where
can I find archived versions of Cygwin?
Andrey Repin wrote:
I believe the target of the symlink should be "protocol" (i.e. singular)
Err. That is. How did no one found it earlier?
---
Because it is plural on unix/linux? MS seems to have
misspelt it?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
Greetings, Walter L.!
> Thanks for the quick response!
>> > 2) The 'touch' command creates a file with the executable bit set
>>
>> > [user@hostname ~]$ touch newfile.txt
>> > [user@hostname ~]$ ls -l newfile.txt
>> > -rwxrwx---+ 1 user Domain Users 0 Sep 22 17:21 newfile.txt
>>
>> > I am fully a
Thanks for the quick response!
> 2) The 'touch' command creates a file with the executable bit set
> [user@hostname ~]$ touch newfile.txt
> [user@hostname ~]$ ls -l newfile.txt
> -rwxrwx---+ 1 user Domain Users 0 Sep 22 17:21 newfile.txt
> I am fully aware that Windows programs (e.g. Eclipse a
Greetings, Walter L.!
> I've just performed a fresh install of the latest (2.2.1) Cygwin on 64-bit
> Windows 7 and noticed 2 issues with the new version that I'd like to verify
> whether or not they are bugs:
> 1) The symlink to protocol file seems incorrect
> [user@hostname /etc]$ ls -l | grep
24 matches
Mail list logo
