Re: Inconsistent handling of python3-module vs python3x-module packages

2022-02-20 Thread Achim Gratz
Adam Dinwoodie writes: >> Patches to cygport to make this work better welcome! > > I _think_ most -- if not all -- the cygport infrastructure is already in > place: cygport clearly already supports both virtual packages and > "provides" listings, which are the only bits of this that I think are > a

Re: Inconsistent handling of python3-module vs python3x-module packages

2022-02-20 Thread Adam Dinwoodie
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:42:56PM +, Jon Turney wrote: > On 16/02/2022 11:45, marco atzeri wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > > > > > > While wrangling a bunch of Python packages for my Cygwin installation, > > > I've noticed an inconsistency about how python

Re: Inconsistent handling of python3-module vs python3x-module packages

2022-02-17 Thread Jon Turney
On 16/02/2022 11:45, marco atzeri wrote: On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote: While wrangling a bunch of Python packages for my Cygwin installation, I've noticed an inconsistency about how python3 vs python3x packages are installed. Only one ? ;-) As an example: the pytho

Re: Inconsistent handling of python3-module vs python3x-module packages

2022-02-16 Thread marco atzeri
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:11 PM Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > > While wrangling a bunch of Python packages for my Cygwin installation, > I've noticed an inconsistency about how python3 vs python3x packages are > installed. Only one ? ;-) > As an example: the python3 package itself describes itself as