Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 12 08:41, D. Boland wrote: > Jason Tishler wrote: > > > > Daniel, > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > To accomplished this, procmail would have to be modified slightly. > > > > From the Cyg

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread D. Boland
Jason Tishler wrote: > > Daniel, > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > > > [snip] > > > To accomplished this, procmail would have to be modified slightly. > > > From the Cygwin website, I can see that procmail is maintained b

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread Jason Tishler
Daniel, On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:46:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > > [snip] > > To accomplished this, procmail would have to be modified slightly. > > From the Cygwin website, I can see that procmail is maintained bij > > Jason Tishler. > > > > I need

Re: Impending ITP of Sendmail

2014-08-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 9 22:41, D. Boland wrote: > Hi group, > > I have the Sendmail port ready. I will anounce my intent to package it > soon. > > There is one thing, though. Sendmail relies heavily on the procmail > program. The problem is that the procmail package as it is now, is not > "multiple root" aware