On 2013-10-12 14:22, marco atzeri wrote:
uploaded Graphics-Magick-1.3.18-3 and Image-Magick-6.7.6.3-4.
Thanks.
I noticed a curios bug on cygport, it reports Graphics-Magick depending
from libpng14 instead of libpng15.
I don't see how, as there never has been a libpng14 for x86_64.
Yaakov
Il 10/11/2013 10:21 AM, marco atzeri ha scritto:
Il 10/11/2013 6:44 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) ha scritto:
Marco,
IIUC, ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick were both built early on for
x86_64, and appear to be missing support for many formats due to missing
libraries at the time. Could you rebuild/updat
Il 10/11/2013 6:44 AM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) ha scritto:
Marco,
IIUC, ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick were both built early on for
x86_64, and appear to be missing support for many formats due to missing
libraries at the time. Could you rebuild/update these now with all
possible formats now that the
As was observed (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-05/msg00034.html),
this seems to depend on new xorg*-6.8.99.901-1.
---
Oh yes, how embarassing! I didn't know there was such a thing as
GraphicsMagick until today, so I didn't google for it.
I rolled back my X packages, and it all works
Peter Pimley wrote:
> If I run ImageMagick's convert, mogrify or identify tools (and possibly
> others, I've not tried), they silently fail
As was observed (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2006-05/msg00034.html),
this seems to depend on new xorg*-6.8.99.901-1.
Perhaps you can use Netpbm, in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the lead developer of ImageMagick I would like to clear up a few
misconceptions being stated on this list.
1. Harold L Hunt II says: This package [GraphicsMagick] will replace
ImageMagick for various reasons. One of those reasons is that the
GM folks are comm
6 matches
Mail list logo
