Re: Having a bad time with g++ under cygwin

2002-01-09 Thread Benjamin Scherrey
OK - I got rid of those but I still get the multiple definitions. All the symbols with multiple definitions are ones that I create, btw. Ben 1/10/2002 1:21:33 AM, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:52:25AM -0500, Benjamin Scherrey wrote: >>Matt,

Re: Having a bad time with g++ under cygwin

2002-01-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 12:52:25AM -0500, Benjamin Scherrey wrote: >Matt, > > Thanx for the idea. It got rid of the "undefined references" but not the >"multiple >definitions". I really don't know where it gets that from. You don't need the -lm -lstdc++ -lkernel32. cgf -- Unsubscribe in

Re: Having a bad time with g++ under cygwin

2002-01-09 Thread Benjamin Scherrey
Matt, Thanx for the idea. It got rid of the "undefined references" but not the "multiple definitions". I really don't know where it gets that from. Ben Scherrey 1/9/2002 11:59:45 PM, "Matthew Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Try linking with g++ instead of ld. > >cheers, >-

Re: Having a bad time with g++ under cygwin

2002-01-09 Thread Matthew Smith
Try linking with g++ instead of ld. cheers, -Matt > I'm getting extremely frustrated trying to get my code to build with g++ 2.95.3-5 (ld 2.11.92) under > the latest cygwin (1.3.6 I think) on a Win2K platform. Attached is the (edited) output of my build. > Basically I build a bunch of object fi