Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:10:05AM -0800, Peter Rehley wrote:
It seems like an improvement. It didn't hang, but after about 4000
iterations of the test script it got a segmentation fault. It ran
for 12 hours with another configure script in a separate window or
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 11:10:05AM -0800, Peter Rehley wrote:
>
>On Feb 23, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:43:25PM -0800, Peter Rehley wrote:
>>>On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>
On 23 February 2006 16:20, Peter Rehley wrote:
>>>
On Feb 23, 2006, at 6:27 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:43:25PM -0800, Peter Rehley wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
On 23 February 2006 16:20, Peter Rehley wrote:
Yeah, I saw that change, and I tried yesterdays snapshot but it
still
hung. I
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 03:43:25PM -0800, Peter Rehley wrote:
>On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
>
>>On 23 February 2006 16:20, Peter Rehley wrote:
>>
>>>Yeah, I saw that change, and I tried yesterdays snapshot but it still
>>>hung. I also did some more googling and found that someone
On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:13 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
On 23 February 2006 16:20, Peter Rehley wrote:
Yeah, I saw that change, and I tried yesterdays snapshot but it still
hung. I also did some more googling and found that someone submitted
a patch a few years ago. The patch checked to see if it wa
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 06:13:40PM -, Dave Korn wrote:
>On 23 February 2006 16:20, Peter Rehley wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I saw that change, and I tried yesterdays snapshot but it still
>> hung. I also did some more googling and found that someone submitted
>> a patch a few years ago. The patch check
On 23 February 2006 16:20, Peter Rehley wrote:
> Yeah, I saw that change, and I tried yesterdays snapshot but it still
> hung. I also did some more googling and found that someone submitted
> a patch a few years ago. The patch checked to see if it was inside
> the ntdll.dll by looking at the han
Hi,
On Feb 23, 2006, at 3:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 21 13:56, Peter Rehley wrote:
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
On 21 February 2006 19:06, Peter Rehley wrote:
Hi,
Well, for my particular hang issue cygwin is hanging inside the
inside_kernel function on the GetM
On Feb 21 13:56, Peter Rehley wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
>
> >On 21 February 2006 19:06, Peter Rehley wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Well, for my particular hang issue cygwin is hanging inside the
> >>inside_kernel function on the GetModuleFileName call. I tracked this
>
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:31 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
On 21 February 2006 19:06, Peter Rehley wrote:
Hi,
Well, for my particular hang issue cygwin is hanging inside the
inside_kernel function on the GetModuleFileName call. I tracked this
down by adding debug statements (strace.prntf) until I got t
On 21 February 2006 19:06, Peter Rehley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, for my particular hang issue cygwin is hanging inside the
> inside_kernel function on the GetModuleFileName call. I tracked this
> down by adding debug statements (strace.prntf) until I got to the
> point where the debug print before
11 matches
Mail list logo
