On Apr 27 10:14, Patrick Julien wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> > The basic problem is that Cygwin doesn't constitute a remote desktop
> > logon server. A session can only be created by a trusted logon process.
> > There isn;'t a simple API to request a new session ID.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Apr 27 09:33, Patrick Julien wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>> wrote:
>> > On Apr 27 08:39, Patrick Julien wrote:
>> >> OK, I understand why it's the privileged token but why is it still in
>> >> session 0
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Apr 27 09:33, Patrick Julien wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen
>> wrote:
>> > On Apr 27 08:39, Patrick Julien wrote:
>> >> OK, I understand why it's the privileged token but why is it still in
>> >> session 0
On Apr 27 09:33, Patrick Julien wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > On Apr 27 08:39, Patrick Julien wrote:
> >> OK, I understand why it's the privileged token but why is it still in
> >> session 0?
> >
> > Because it's started in session 0. Creating our own se
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Apr 27 08:39, Patrick Julien wrote:
>> OK, I understand why it's the privileged token but why is it still in
>> session 0?
>
> Because it's started in session 0. Creating our own session for each user
> could result in an enormous mem
On Apr 27 08:39, Patrick Julien wrote:
> OK, I understand why it's the privileged token but why is it still in session
> 0?
Because it's started in session 0. Creating our own session for each user
could result in an enormous memory leak.
> Also, it doesn't really explain why the files are all
OK, I understand why it's the privileged token but why is it still in session 0?
Also, it doesn't really explain why the files are all installed with
ownership set to me
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Apr 26 15:34, Patrick Julien wrote:
>> I have read the page foun
On Apr 26 15:34, Patrick Julien wrote:
> I have read the page found at
> http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/ntsec.html but I still see the
> following 2 issues with filtered tokens as implemented by Vista/7 when
> used by cygwin.
>
> When I say filtered tokens, I'm talking about the dual token st
8 matches
Mail list logo