On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:28:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I should point out that I didn't rebuild my packages under 1.5.19 either
> so I'm just as guilty as any other package maintainer in this regard.
Speaking of which, in the course of making a small patch to ld (which
I hope the bi
>
> Linux has an equivalent getline() call. Apache (presumably, I haven't
> checked) builds on Linux. Thus, either Cygwin's getline declaration is
> somehow different from Linux's (in which case it should be fixed in
> Cygwin), or Apache is doing something different in Cygwin than in Linux
> (in
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, pobox wrote:
> > I like this slogan: "Cygwin: nice, but not reliable". We should adopt
> > this, and refer 90% of the mailing list complaints to it. :-)
> > Igor
>
> I am not really sure how to understand the joke.
Only that Cygwin cannot be expected to be fully tested
I like this slogan: "Cygwin: nice, but not reliable". We should adopt
this, and refer 90% of the mailing list complaints to it. :-)
Igor
I am not really sure how to understand the joke.
cygwin worked flawlessly for me for very long time. May be I have been
lucky, but this made me dev
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:28:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:46:31PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> >>The only care that really could be taken to prevent things like this
> >>is more users testing pre-re
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:28:50PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:46:31PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>>The only care that really could be taken to prevent things like this
>>is more users testing pre-release versions. Development snapshots of
>>cygwin with
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:46:31PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
>The only care that really could be taken to prevent things like this
>is more users testing pre-release versions. Development snapshots of
>cygwin with getline() have been available for a long time now. Note
>that this isn'
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 10:43:30PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I used cygwin happily for very long time to compile
> apache/php/postgresql and enjoy symlinks, and now I am cut-off from one
> day to the next. The apache folks do not seem to care. The bug I
> submitted is still without reply
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> I do not want to heat the discussion, but getline() in cygwin played
> very hard against me.
Like I said in the other thread, you can fix this in Apache (and
cdrtools for that matter -- see attached patch) with a couple of
#defines in the offending files. It's really
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, pobox wrote:
> > This falls into the same category as my previous discussion about
> > _POSIX_SOURCE. If a program builds without problem on linux, the goal
> > is for it to build without problem on cygwin. It seems like the
> > unconditional addition of getline to the heade
This falls into the same category as my previous discussion about
_POSIX_SOURCE. If a program builds without problem on linux, the goal
is for it to build without problem on cygwin. It seems like the
unconditional addition of getline to the headers moves us a step back
from that goal.
Is this
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 06:25:13PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>somebody wrote:
>>I don't know if cygwin's interface can easily be changed, but
>>considering that J?rg doesn't seem to be willing to modify his code,
>>what do you think that could be done to solve this problem? I hope
>>that a solution
>
> This is what he answered:
Joerg is known to be stubborn. You should try reading all
his comments on the bug-tar list, where he claims that his
implementation star is hands-down superior to GNU tar. Just
take it with a grain of salt.
>
> Try to convince cygwin to remove their non-confo
On Jan 24 18:46, Simone Crestani wrote:
> Hi,
> I found out that cygwin 1.5.19 gives some problems when I try to compile
> cdrtools and cdrdao.
> [...]
>Try to convince cygwin to remove their non-conforming interface
>definition.
>
>The getline() iterface I use goes back to 1982 and h
14 matches
Mail list logo
