Re: Distribution of cygwin (free and commercial)

2008-04-12 Thread Reini Urban
2008/4/11, Hans Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have read the "FAQ suggestion", and I wanted to open a new thread about > the possible distribution of cygwin. (I cannot access the old thread) > > Before I start, I want you to check what happened to Eclipse, KDE, Gnome, > 7-zip and so on. Really

Re: Distribution of cygwin (free and commercial)

2008-04-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:20:47PM +0200, Hans Kaiser wrote: >Hello all, > >I have read the "FAQ suggestion", and I wanted to open a new thread about >the possible distribution of cygwin. (I cannot access the old thread) > >Before I start, I want you to check what happened to Eclipse, KDE, Gnome, >

Re: Distribution of cygwin (free and commercial)

2008-04-11 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Hans Kaiser wrote: Hello all, I have read the "FAQ suggestion", and I wanted to open a new thread about the possible distribution of cygwin. (I cannot access the old thread) Before I start, I want you to check what happened to Eclipse, KDE, Gnome, 7-zip and so on. Really many, many people are u

Re: Distribution of cygwin (free and commercial)

2008-04-11 Thread Andrew Schulman
> Hello all, > > I have read the "FAQ suggestion", and I wanted to open a new thread about > the possible distribution of cygwin. (I cannot access the old thread) > > Before I start, I want you to check what happened to Eclipse, KDE, Gnome, > 7-zip and so on. Really many, many people are using th

Re: Distribution

2001-12-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:47:42AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:38:57PM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote: >>>If you are in compliance with the licensing of each of the packages >>>that you will be releasing (including the cygwin DLL) then you should >>>be ok. I can

Re: Distribution

2001-12-21 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:38:57PM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote: >>If you are in compliance with the licensing of each of the packages >>that you will be releasing (including the cygwin DLL) then you should >>be ok. I can only speak in a semi-official capacity for cygwin. The >>other packages

RE: Distribution

2001-12-21 Thread Bernard Dautrevaux
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Distribution > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:34:10PM +0100, Lapo Luchi

Re: Distribution

2001-12-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 06:34:10PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: >> In reality I really only need the cygwin and bash base with devel and editor >> components (in order to teach C Language on win-tel platforms), the others >> are simply gravy. Thanks again for your assistance! > >I'm a profane of le

Re: Distribution

2001-12-18 Thread Lapo Luchini
> In reality I really only need the cygwin and bash base with devel and editor > components (in order to teach C Language on win-tel platforms), the others > are simply gravy. Thanks again for your assistance! I'm a profane of legal issues but I bet that as long as you include full sources and t

Re: Distribution

2001-12-18 Thread michael vine
tware Engineer / Technical Author / Part-Time Faculty (MTI College) 916-843-5748 >From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Distribution >Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 21:36:59 -0500 > >

Re: Distribution

2001-12-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 06:24:23PM -0800, michael vine wrote: >My name is Michael Vine and I'm a technical author with Premier press. I'm >starting a new beginner's book on C Language development on UNIX platforms. > >I've found CYGWIN to be very effective for teaching and learning C Language