Re: cygwin 1.3.19-1 file permission out of sync with NTFS on XP?

2003-02-03 Thread Javier
"Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje 019301c2cbc0$c6df0860$696f86d9@webdev">news:019301c2cbc0$c6df0860$696f86d9@webdev... > > Did the permission code changed somewhere between cygwin 1.3.12 and > 1.3.19-1 ? > > It there something I can do to make them sync up again ? > > (N

Re: cygwin 1.3.19-1 file permission out of sync with NTFS on XP?

2003-02-03 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 11:14:03AM -0800, Andrew Chang wrote: > > I have a situation in which a cygwin app created a file, chmod it to readonly. > then we have a win32 app chomd the same file to writable (0644). > In cygiwn 1.3.12, the new write permission would show up in the > cygwin "ls -l" comma

Re: cygwin 1.3.19-1 file permission out of sync with NTFS on XP?

2003-02-03 Thread Andrew Chang
On Monday 03 February 2003 12:03 pm, Max Bowsher wrote: > Andrew Chang wrote: > > I have a situation in which a cygwin app created a file, chmod it to > > readonly. > > then we have a win32 app chomd the same file to writable (0644). > > In cygiwn 1.3.12, the new write permission would show up in t

Re: cygwin 1.3.19-1 file permission out of sync with NTFS on XP?

2003-02-03 Thread Elfyn McBratney
> Did the permission code changed somewhere between cygwin 1.3.12 and 1.3.19-1 ? > It there something I can do to make them sync up again ? > (Note: I also tried "CYGWIN=ntsec", it does not help). Did your old install use ntsec (ntsec in the CYGWIN environment variable)? If not that may be why. nt

Re: cygwin 1.3.19-1 file permission out of sync with NTFS on XP?

2003-02-03 Thread Max Bowsher
Andrew Chang wrote: > I have a situation in which a cygwin app created a file, chmod it to > readonly. > then we have a win32 app chomd the same file to writable (0644). > In cygiwn 1.3.12, the new write permission would show up in the > cygwin "ls -l" command. In cygwin 1.3.19-1, the write permiss

Re: cygwin 1.3.19-1 and up: Garbage printed in ls output if the user entry is missing from /etc/passwd

2003-01-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:16:30PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote: >Hello, > >I've just completed a fresh installation of Cygwin on Win2k Pro / SP3. I >installed Cygwin as Administrator but then created an user called ptsekov. >It happened that I forgot to update the password database after I created

RE: RE: Cygwin 1.3.19-1

2003-01-24 Thread Robert McNulty Junior
I knew I forgot something. Thanks, Tim. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Timothy C Prince Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 7:11 PM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: Cygwin 1.3.19-1 -Original Message- From: "Robert Mc

RE: Cygwin 1.3.19-1

2003-01-24 Thread Robert McNulty Junior
ubject: Re: Cygwin 1.3.19-1 Robert McNulty Junior wrote: > Max, I used Timidity, too. Compiled Fine. > With Gcc-3.2.2, before the changes today. > I'll go back as soon as I think about this through. > If you noticed on the gcc-3.2.2 (later on) what caused it was a > couple of missing

Re: RE: Cygwin 1.3.19-1

2003-01-24 Thread Timothy C Prince
-Original Message- From: "Robert McNulty Junior" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:37:37 -0600 Subject: RE: Cygwin 1.3.19-1 Max, I used Timidity, too. Compiled Fine. With Gcc-3.

Re: Cygwin 1.3.19-1

2003-01-24 Thread Max Bowsher
JCF and another. > I'll look into either sources. Um? I don't know what Timidity is, and I have never compiled a gcc-3.x. Max. > -Original Message- > From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:32 PM > To: Robert McNulty Junior;

RE: Cygwin 1.3.19-1

2003-01-24 Thread Robert McNulty Junior
--Original Message- From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:32 PM To: Robert McNulty Junior; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.3.19-1 Robert McNulty Junior wrote: > I went back to Cygwin 1.3.18-1 > Sorry, Chris. > It was too buggy trying

Re: Cygwin 1.3.19-1

2003-01-24 Thread Max Bowsher
Robert McNulty Junior wrote: > I went back to Cygwin 1.3.18-1 > Sorry, Chris. > It was too buggy trying to compile the GCC compilers. Well, that is what [prev] is for - but it might be in your interest to try to find a smaller testcase than "compile gcc-3.3 or above" ! Strange that it should say