On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> >Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> >> Patch prepared, I'll finish writing it up and submit to the newlib list
> >> later tonight, but first I'm going to have a celebratory beer or two on
> >> t
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>Dave Korn wrote:
>
>> Patch prepared, I'll finish writing it up and submit to the newlib list
>> later tonight, but first I'm going to have a celebratory beer or two on
>> the way home...
>
>I have applied the patch
>(http://sourcewa
Dave Korn wrote:
> Patch prepared, I'll finish writing it up and submit to the newlib list
> later tonight, but first I'm going to have a celebratory beer or two on
> the way home...
I have applied the patch
(http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2007/msg00292.html) an GCC-4.3
(core+gfortran) builds (
On 25 March 2007 00:55, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 22 March 2007 22:08, Brian Dessent wrote:
>
>> The real problem seems to be that the libgcc is broken:
>
>> /home/User/cvsroot/gcc-obj/./prev-gcc/libgcc.a(_ctors.o): In function
>> `__sgetc_r': /usr/include/stdio.h:414: undefined reference to `_unget
On 22 March 2007 22:08, Brian Dessent wrote:
> The real problem seems to be that the libgcc is broken:
> /home/User/cvsroot/gcc-obj/./prev-gcc/libgcc.a(_ctors.o): In function
> `__sgetc_r':
> /usr/include/stdio.h:414: undefined reference to `_ungetc'
> /usr/include/stdio.h:410: undefined referenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
As I wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31039
Ah, okay. I failed to see that you'd posted the config.log there. (And
I mentioned gmp/mpfr as I have seen that cause the build to fail in
exactly the way you described, but it's
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 06:55:16PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>There is no conspiracy. What is needed is for there to be a vocal
>>advocate on the gcc list for Windows patches. I can only approve a very
>>limited amount of stuff so we need gcc global maintainers to approv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no conspiracy. What is needed is for there to be a vocal
advocate on the gcc list for Windows patches. I can only approve a very
limited amount of stuff so we need gcc global maintainers to approve the
majority of Windows fixes.
I didn't call it a conspiracy,
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> As I wrote:
>
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31039
Ah, okay. I failed to see that you'd posted the config.log there. (And
I mentioned gmp/mpfr as I have seen that cause the build to fail in
exactly the way you described, but it's clearly not the case
Brian Dessent wrote:
> You'll have to look at config.log but this is probably a problem with
> your system lacking all the required gmp and mpfr library packages.
> Make sure you have them all.
I have obviously GMP and MPFR installed and, as I wrote
>>...
>> The last 4.3.0 source that builds
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:23:46AM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry, but the concerns expressed in the messages above are rank
>> paranoia. *Microsoft* has nothing to do with the lack of operable
>> modern gcc's on windows, and there is no conspiracy to break gcc o
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > (2) the java runtime library is huge, and to even attempt to link it
> > as a DLL requires massive (>1GB) amounts of RAM. I seem to recall
> > that this is due to inefficiencies in the way ld creates import
> > libra
Charles Wilson wrote:
> I'm sorry, but the concerns expressed in the messages above are rank
> paranoia. *Microsoft* has nothing to do with the lack of operable
> modern gcc's on windows, and there is no conspiracy to break gcc on cygwin.
Yes, that's pure FUD.
> But having an active maintainer
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> checking for i686-pc-cygwin-gcc... /tmp/gcc/.build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
> -B/tmp/gcc/.build/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/gfortran/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/
> checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
> compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' f
Angelo Graziosi wrote:
It is almost a month that the build og gcc-core 4.3.0 on Cygwin is broken:
The last 4.3.0 source that builds fine is GCC-4.3.0-20070224-trunk-122292.
The strange thing is not that a development version of GCC is broken, but
that there is NOT much will to solve it for CY
Hope you can help,
The 'normal' C headers are part of the C library (newlib/cygwin), the
GCC C headers are installed somewhere below /usr/lib/gcc or
/usr/share/gcc, depending on the version you're building.
Ah. Thanks alot Gerrit, that puts my mind at rest. Although it is not
exactly very neat.
T
Aaron Gray wrote:
Hi,
I believe or am pritty sure I have a problem. I am building GCC 3.4.3
but the same problem happerns with 2.95.3 and presumably with other
GCC's. I have built this before and got it to work and I am sure I had
other includes present.
Yes I know Cygwin GCC3.4.3 has not been
There is a bug preventing from using MinGW/MSYS to build it successfully. Of
course, this bug has reported by folks at MinGW.
I am in agreement that Ada compiler is not complete if run-time tasking is not
supported. Is there any plan to support it in the future?
AV
>>> "Williams, Gerald S (Je
Anh Vo wrote:
> I successfully built it for three languages Ada, C, C++ with
> configured as --enable-languages=ada,c,c++
> --enable-threads=gnat. A number of Ada Conformance Assessment
> Test Suite (ACATS) failed. Further testing reveals that the
> Ada runtime tasking support was not included
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:28:38 -0500
"Joe Buehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had downloaded this but not tried it yet. If you get it
> working it would be "interesting" to recompile Cygwin and
> all of its packages and see what happens. We have most of
> the core dumps out of our local Cygwin
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:28:38PM -0500, Joe Buehler wrote:
>Bill Priest wrote:
>>I've built gcc w/ the bounds checking patch on Linux and solaris and am
>>trying to build it on cygwin (w/ the cygwin modified source from
>>setup). With tweak to one file I've been able to get it to bootstrap
>>w/o
Bill Priest wrote:
I've built gcc w/ the bounds checking patch on Linux
and solaris and am trying to build it on cygwin (w/
the
cygwin modified source from setup). With tweak to
one file I've been able to get it to bootstrap w/o
any errors and the resulting C compiler will work
w/o specifying "
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:24:36AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Da'niel Csabai wrote:
>>I plan to have a development suite targeted to arm platform
>>(arm-elf-tools) (gcc, as, ld, objcopy, etc) for Cywin. I know it is
>>possible to build up gcc 3.2 a
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:50:31AM +0200, Da'niel Csabai wrote:
>I plan to have a development suite targeted to arm platform
>(arm-elf-tools) (gcc, as, ld, objcopy, etc) for Cywin. I know it is
>possible to build up gcc 3.2 as cross-compiler.
>I think need a specific gcc (ver. 3.2 or 3.3) & binu
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Da'niel Csabai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to have a development suite targeted to arm platform
> (arm-elf-tools) (gcc, as, ld, objcopy, etc) for Cywin. I know it is
> possible to build up gcc 3.2 as cross-compiler.
> I think need a specific gcc (ver. 3.2 or 3.3) & binutils & gdb
> > I'm attempting to build gcc-2.8.1 cross compiler using the following
> > configuration..
>
>[why such an old compiler?]
This is the suggested version from Sony to program for the IO Processor of
the Playstation 2. Maybe newer versions would be ok, but this is the one
suggested.
> > ./c
"David Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm attempting to build gcc-2.8.1 cross compiler using the following
> configuration..
[why such an old compiler?]
> ./configure --target=mipsel-scei-elfl --prefix=/usr/local/ps2dev/iop --with-
> gnu-ld --with-gnu-as
>
> I have compiled and installed b
At 07:46 PM 2/26/2002, David Ryan wrote:
>>From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "David Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Building gcc-2.8.1 cross compiler.
>>Date: Tue, 26
>From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "David Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Building gcc-2.8.1 cross compiler.
>Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:36:58 -0500
>
>At 07:19 PM 2/26/2002, Dav
At 07:19 PM 2/26/2002, David Ryan wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm attempting to build gcc-2.8.1 cross compiler using the following
>configuration..
>
>./configure --target=mipsel-scei-elfl --prefix=/usr/local/ps2dev/iop --with-
>gnu-ld --with-gnu-as
>
>I have compiled and installed binutils-2.9.1 into /usr/loc
30 matches
Mail list logo
